Why is Obama's Iran nuclear deal good?

There is nothing in this deal that Iran can provide security that asserts this transaction.

If the West want to dispatch inspectors to the West, they must announce their visit 24 days ago, that if Iran violates the agreement and we are going to find out, the country will delete evidence on 24th It means that there is.

If there is evidence that someone doubts that Iran has violated this transaction, only an inspector can be dispatched. In other words, it is very fortunate that they developed weapons if they truly violated the deal. Previously found

After another 50 days, eight countries including Iran will participate in the committee and discuss whether or not a violation has occurred.

Then, somehow we can prove that Iran has broken the contract, the West must wait 65 days before ordering new sanctions. This is totally arbitrary and meaningless.

Another part of Iran's current agreement includes energy, finance, technology and trade improvement funded and led by the West. Indeed, the total amount we give to Iran is more than US $ 100 billion (current Iran's frozen assets are equivalent to US $ 100 billion + sanctions relaxation measures).

What I want to remind you now is the West side to Yemen, Hamas of Israel, Hezbollah of Lebanon and Syria, the influence of the Shiites of Iraq and the Assad Administration of Syria. Control by Iran

Iran's agreement is a direct betrayal against our soldiers and allies, as we help fund our enemies and our allies' enemies.

This agreement allowed Iran's sanctions. For example, if the West rebuffs Israel or begins genocide, the nuclear trade will fail and Iran can legitimately ignore the nuclear agreement.

The agreement will expire within 10 years. In other words, if Iran wants to continue the nuclear development program, we can not stop it.

Iranian trade has no advantage and does not recognize its importance, and even worse, it improves the economy of the direct enemies of the US and its allies.

President Obama enacted "nuclear agreement of Iran" to prevent nuclear proliferation from being suppressed. They obey the contract, why should they revoke certification? I understood that because it has Obama 's name and the cards do not care about the result. Cancellation of authorization gives Congress this for 60 days and they can decide whether to impose new sanctions on Iran. Even if they re - authenticate, the act of kicking it to Congress will reduce the reliability of the United States in future negotiations, not only by Iran but by other countries. Why did North Korea reach an agreement with the United States if the president may abandon this agreement at any time as he was angry that day?

Iran - End the international nuclear trading of President Obama - The playing cards campaign promises to withdraw the United States from the Obama administration and the nuclear trading of Iran designed by other countries of the international community, and he is guided by Europe Despite the violent attack on the person, I realized it. He said that Iran's agreement to relax the nuclear program in exchange for moderate sanctions is flawed. He made better negotiations and promised to point to North Korea. The Pacific Rim Partnership (TPP) - Other countries will enter the United States - another agreement in the Obama era Mr. Trump opposed it as a candidate. The end of the TPP is one of his first acts as President. Countries involved in large-scale trade agreements aim to offset the expanding power of China, continue without the United States, and sign a unique trade agreement. Playing cards are always crazy about participation, but I will not pursue this idea.

President Obama 's Iran agreement did not cause nuclear war. This agreement prevented Iran from advancing nuclear weapons. Even if he wants, even the playing card does not retreat. The biggest threat to nuclear war in recent years was due to North Korea testing ICBM a week ago. His argument did not happen, but it happened under the supervision of playing cards. You insist that Mr. Obama, Mr. Jesse Jackson and Mr. El Sharputon are sneaky against completely causing ethnic divisions. The latter two are civil rights leaders who have worked hard for the rights of black people for many years. Ethnic conflict occurred in the 1960s as people fought for the same rights. Mr. Obama encourages the termination of the police killing by racial prejudice rather than promoting hatred against the police. Your racial reconciliation version seems to require minorities to close and understand their whereabouts. I am anxious for Mr. Obama, not Mr. Obama, to return to the past.