Why is it necessary to have government ?

Political thinkers say the government needs to protect our rights. Without the government, we have sufficiently strong rights to protect ourselves.

Without the government, our society may be "everyone is there for ourselves." Because there is no power to maintain peace, this is free for everyone. Political thinkers say that this "natural state" is very difficult for people as we have to use our power to protect our lives, freedoms and wealth. Anyone who can demonstrate more power can take away these things.

This is the reason people create cities. Thinkers said that people signed a "social contract". They abandoned part of the government's freedom. They give governments the right of governance and taxation. In return, the government promises to protect its rights. It promises to prevent others from stealing them and killing them and enslaving them

In other words, without the government, we will live in chaotic nature and there is no right other than the right to protect with our own power.

If the government is not a necessary evil, how does the government develop? Some may think that in order for the government to gain more knowledge and prosperity in its own government, it is necessary to ensure that these necessary evils coexist with the government. Contrary to this view, the necessary evil is abolished and it can be said that a perfect and perfect government has to be pursued. - The 1770s proved to be a time of confusion and controversy. Thirteen colonies who soon gained independence are in conflict with the UK. These colonies suffered from repeated injuries and a scourge of insults in the UK.

James Madison writes to Federalist 51 as follows. Well then. There are many reasons for us to live in a great country, but what we inherit tends to be wasted rather than doubling.

Male, government external and internal controls are necessary. The biggest challenge in developing a government managed by men is that you must first allow the government to control governance and to govern itself in the next place Force. There is no doubt that dependency on people is the main control of the government, but experience tells humans to take precautionary measures. "See Federalist 51." Control also weakens the exercise of government power. This is a negative view of the role of the government. The main problem posed by federalists seems to be how to prevent effective arbitrary exercise of political power, not how to guarantee effective political leadership . Do you accept Madison as the main objective of establishing a government system? Is the Constitution Really Negative as Madison suggests?