Why is bilingual education ‘good’ for rich kids but ‘bad’ for poor, immigrant students?

(Clarification: How is Karin Davenport in US English thinking about multilanguage support funded by the government.)

If you are concerned about unresolved arguments about bilingual education, I know that there are two basic objections. As written by Claire Bowern, author of the next article,

Frankly, bilingualism is often considered "good" when an English-speaking person adds a language as a hobby or other international language, but for poor people, ethnic or indigenous peoples speak English first Add to the language. Even when it comes to the same two languages, bilingual is very bad.

& Lt; Tab / & gt; Some people think that bilingual education is not as bad as Richard Rodriguez. Richard Rodriguez is the son of a Mexican immigrant who is one third of four children. He does not support bilingual education, he considers "losing means income" (108). If you do not understand your mother tongue you will get English. But I ceased to agree with Richard Rodriguez about his view on bilingual education and lost average income. I think that bilingual education only serves to help students, and I think that they will not lose. Bilingual education is a good course to help immigrant students complete their studies. Bilingual education helps immigrant students master English and their mother tongue. They lose one and do not need to get another.

Frankly, bilingualism is often considered "good" when an English-speaking person adds a language as a hobby or other international language, but for poor people, ethnic or indigenous peoples speak English first Add to the language. Even when it comes to the same two languages, bilingual is very bad.

The biggest concern of immigrants is that it could ruin what they make them attractive. Institutions in poor countries are often not good. There are good countries in rich countries - this is the reason they are rich. Benefits of a good system for the poor to immigrate to a rich country. But, as many of them move, will you supersede Swiss norms like Nigerian norms and make these institutions drown? In other words, "How many new people can absorb in a rich country"? The history of the United States shows that the number grows over time. Its population is growing from the current 1,800 to 320 meters (including 900,000 black slaves). Mr. Clemens and Lant Pritchett at Harvard University modeled the number of immigrants necessary to bring rich institutions closer to institutions in poor countries, presuming from what we can observe today. Their answer is as follows. It is much more feasible than currently thought