Why gay marriages should not have been legalised

1) Homosexuality is not natural. Genuine South Africans always refuse unnatural things such as glasses, polyester, air conditioners.

2) Homosexual marriage encourages people to become homosexual, just as high-level people make you taller.

3) Legalizing gay marriages opens doors to all kinds of crazy actions. Dogs have a legal status and can sign a marriage contract so people may even want to marry their own pet.

4) Direct marriage has existed for a long time, has not changed; women are still property, blacks can not marry yet white people yet divorce is illegal yet.

5) If gay marriage is approved, direct marriage has little meaning, Britney Spears's 55 hour improvised marriage sacredness will be destroyed.

6) Direct marriage is effective because there are children. Because our orphanage is not full yet, the world needs more children, homosexual partners, infertile couples, seniors should not be allowed to marry.

7) Clearly, homosexual parents will increase homosexuality. Because parents raise straight children.

8) Same sexual marriage is not supported by religion. Religious values ​​are imposed on the whole country in the theocratic regime like us. That is why we have only one religion in South Africa.

9) There are no examples of men and women at home, children will never succeed. This is the reason why parents explicitly prohibit parenting as our society.

10) Homosexual marriage changes the foundation of society; we will never be able to adapt to new social norms. Just like not accustomed to cars and mobile phones

In general, in these discussions it is clear that gay marriage "to support and oppose" will become a very controversial topic in society as a whole. On the other hand, same-sex marriage should be legalized for equality rights; on the other hand, gay marriage should not be legalized due to such controversial issues; influence on children and their parenting Weaken the sacred system of social marriage giving. To summarize the discussion of "yes" and "opposite" of same-sex marriage, the case study of Anna Bligh, Julia Gillard, Tony Abbott and Carolina affair clearly made the concept of same-sex marriage correct. I clearly understand these problems. Problems faced by society

To evaluate the "opposite" case study on gay marriage, we can see the idea of ​​Prime Minister Julia Gillard and opposition party Tony Abbott not to legalize same-sex marriage in Australia and abroad. The views of Gillard and Abbott show a clear understanding of the legitimacy of same-sex marriage. This is different from Annabray 's response to legitimacy of same - sex marriage in society, allowing same - sex couples to be equal. According to an article by Sydney Morning Herald on June 30, 2010, Julia Gillard said that same - sex marriage I opposed her view on. In an article by Sydney Morning Herald, she is aware that marriage is a marriage between men and women, I believe that marriage is a gender marriage and is appropriate in the present form, but acts as a government that treats homosexual partners equally "Said. (SMH website, 2011)