Why eyewitnesses get it wrong with Scott Fraser

What happens if you are an innocent crime, but are convicted based on the testimony of the six witnesses? Impossible - unfortunately, it may be more general than you are aware. And yes, it could happen to you or someone you love. Once you are convicted, please be aware that it is difficult to convince yourself of your innocence

When it becomes a witness of a criminal trial, the accuracy of human memory may mean the difference between life and death.

In 2011, Fraser participated in a retrial of the 1992 murder case, where Francisco Carillo was convicted and two life sentences were sentenced. Fraser and his team hired a dramatic recreation of the night of murder and proved that the testimony that Carrillo was in prison was untrustworthy. After being sentenced to imprisonment for 20 years, Karilo was released.

Scott Fraser is an expert witness who studies the authenticity and selectivity of human memory and crime. His field of expertise is the influence of human night vision, neuropsychopharmacology, stress and other factors on human thought. He testified in criminal and civil lawsuits in US states and federal courts

When a judge enters a crime scene, why is this an important turning point? Should this be a standard way for important exams?

Do you have any relationships between six witnesses and young people for Francisco Carrillo? Think about your brain development and your understanding of the subject of research in adolescence.

Learn more about the Innocence project. Read The Innocent Man by John Grisham and write a paper on understanding your mistaken beliefs.

Scott Fraser explained in TED 's lecture "Why witnesses misunderstood it" in 2012, that the reliability of human memory is low. According to him, undue reliance on eyewitness testimony in the American judicial process mistakenly convicted many innocent people. For example, in the 1991 murder case, an innocent man was arrested based on a witness statement supporting the shooting. However, in a subsequent survey, it became clear that it is impossible for humans to clearly see the site when a murder case occurred. This story shows that human memory is not always reliable. Our memories are made up of information stored in various parts of the brain. According to Fraser, whenever people try to remember their past experiences, the information is rebuilt and our idea creates new information to fill in the lost gap.

At the TED's speech by a forensic scientist, Scott Fraser, he explained the reality that perpetrators were mistaken for crimes in witness testimony. He started with a story: drive his father who was playing with his children in the front yard. A man accused of being an archer was found guilty and sentenced to life imprisonment. There is no gun, there is no evidence of the vehicle, only the testimony of the two sons of the man. The convicted man claimed innocence for 21 years. After 22 years imprisonment, he became a free man for Scott Fraser's forensic work.