Why Do States Go to War?

Question: Why does the country do war? School 1: A country seeking more power, to use war in an anarchic state as a means to acquire more power and maintain power. Evera, S. V. (1998). Attack, defense, and reasons for war. International Security, 4 (22), 5-43. According to Evera, if the country gains benefits among nations from http: //www.stanford.edu/class/polisci211z/2.1/Van%20Evera%20IS%201998.pdf they are likely to participate in the war It is high. They are involved in war. (Evera 5) According to Evera, there are several reasons that one country thinks to participate in war, and they are paying attention to the decision of that country.

Only when the reason for accepting war is justified, the state can start a war. In other words, the state should not pursue a narrow national interest (such as consolidation of territories or aggression war) as claimed by realists, but aim for establishment of "just peace". Examples of legitimate reasons include humanitarian intervention - the government has the concept of ultimate sovereignty until they violate the social contract (protective responsibility) of the person they serve. For the sake of simplicity, if the situation is improved by war then war is just that.

It can be said that "war is the subject of peace". Is not it so? Because the war has not fundamentally opposed the development of human values, just because the head of state has declared there is no future war just because there is not enough resources to continue large scale expansion It is not. A small time when the empire and the state drew revenge was called "peace". Returning to the present, Aleppo's annoying confusion resulted from the murder of the rebel army against the Asad regime and ultimately the defeat of the Islamic state. The people are adopted to counter the "threat" defined by the people. Maybe, but how realistic is that? Does Saddam Hussein really have weapons of mass destruction as claimed by George Bush and all the West, or are the threats threatening to restore the west side?

One of the main reasons for the war between the US and Iraq is that they believe that Saddam is producing weapons of mass destruction for use by the United States and other countries. Now, in the war with Iraq, the Bush administration knows that by proposing these claims, they must provide evidence of all actions. After that, America succeeded in Saddam Hussein. The United States can place inspectors to judge whether Saddam is really developing weapons of mass destruction. If inspectors were able to enter Iraq completely, they concluded that some materials that made weapons of mass destruction were in Iraq, but they did not develop them. The United States is looking for weapons of mass destruction, but some things were destroyed before the United Nations could settle them.