Why do people say money doesn't bring happiness?

There are many writers in my favorite place. But I do not always quote them to support my view. It is because I know that my possibility of choosing to explain that it may not be 100% is high, and that is consistent with what the author said.

I think that this is exactly what you did when asking this question, and you are forcing your own explanation in the details of the problem.

Even saying "money does not bring happiness" does not mean "money brings happiness." It's not. From a purely linguistic point of view, these two statements are completely different. The first statement said that happiness has nothing to do with money, so it is not money to bring happiness. truly

You can do your own experiments. Forget the words like "but", "if", "however" and think about the moment when you are really happy. How is that possible? If wealth brings happiness and you are not rich, how can you be happy?

If I am very happy now, prove you need to be happy if you are happy. Of course, I can easily say away from that topic as follows.

If you have money, you will not be satisfied to do whatever you want, other "obligations" that lead you like your current "obligation" away from what you want to do There will be.

Third, things will not make you happy. Just as you like your social network and tributes will not make you happy, they will give you a quick upgrade, but unless you only spend your time shopping, you get all new meanings I will lose.

If it is very difficult to become rich, if happiness is so easy, why do you refuse happiness without needing wealth?

This does not mean money is evil. This does not mean you should stay poor. But this means not to confuse things. In other cases, you need to receive a 6 - digit 6 - digit salary as before to dare to ask a person.

Con's argument is that temporary happiness is not happy. It is like saying that Moni that does not always exist is not money. This argument is not about whether money brings "eternal" happiness. It does not mean that marriage can not make you happy just because marriage does not bring "eternal" happiness, it can also be said that it is money. Con is about to turn this topic into a religious topic about "eternal" happiness. A nasty trick. If Con once used economics, he will know that it is the source of the need for Manslow and can be achieved only after people meet his basic needs, and modern In the world, people money can do this. . They are not as lucky as few so-called "saints" who stated that everything is free.

Most people associate more happiness with more money, as they believe in the freedom the former brings. But that is not the case. As many people know, the economic utility (money) of money is limited and the couple's annual limit is about $ 70,000 to $ 80,000. This number varies from city to city, but the fact remains unchanged. Money does not bring happiness. Most people consider their assets as assets. They are watching valuable items that increase their value by looking at their own closet and living room. The downside of this way of thinking is that we rarely give you the satisfaction that things think we are satisfied. In fact, what you have is more likely to be the responsibility to prevent you from living in your way.