Why do animal shelters kill animals?

First of all, too many people refuse to be responsible for breeding their pets, or they give up on their pets when they get tired of pets. So problem

Secondly, there are basically two different methods to allow shelter people to find a house for many other unwanted pets. The murder shelter does not try to find a good house for all the animals they accept - no one can euthanize. Other evacuation centers euthanize animals that were not used for a while to maximize the number of pets they can find in their home. Some people think the murder is more moral. Some people are seeing animals kept indefinitely, others do not want to use them, and other floating animals are exposed to the impact of pregnancy, fighting, earthworms, mites, cars It is unpopular when you do. I do not have an ax to study because I think that both have advantages and neither of them will work.

But I have an ax to study a dog biting a child for no reason - they must euthanize. I had a strange conversation with someone at the evacuation center. I volunteered for hours. I asked the dog who went out to wander, but it was not allowed outside. She is a big woman there for nearly three years. When I asked why no one adopted her, the woman said that the dog had to find a special house in order to attack the child. I can not believe what I heard. I pointed out that even if she found a "special house," the dog could escape and loosen. I asked who was responsible if the dog attacked the child. The woman insists that she will eventually find the right home with an 8-foot fence! I told her that a dog attacking a child should be euthanized and she said treat dogs given the right of life as a person. After acknowledging that the attack on children was absolutely irrational, she said very firmly. I am no longer volunteering there.

Please do not participate in murder shelter or traditional shelter. In my experience, I did not place a traditional shelter to euthanize animals. Likewise, traditional shelters criticized the absence of murder shelters. Some say that shelters should not be sanctuaries unless all evacuation centers are harmless shelters. Likewise, some evacuation centers that do not kill people accuse traditional shelter "killing". "There is no animal, heart and soul, we must stop this!

I've recently done a few research on traditional animal shelters and animal shelters that have not been killed but I found some very interesting things about these two evacuation centers. Despite the differences, both shelters have the same goal of trying to find a house for all animals in their hands and trying to stop animals from becoming homeless . All these evacuation centers have similarities, and then there is a big difference. First of all, both types of shelters depend heavily on volunteers to help daily activities and care of animals. They all depend on donations and subsidies to operate evacuation centers. This is where the similarity really ends.

"Stop" often has different meanings for asylum. Killing prevention campaign was founded by an Association for atrocities against animals (SPCA). Some evacuation centers saved all animals, while other evacuation centers were as high as 10%. Since the general consensus that there is no evacuation shelter for killing is that 90% of animals are nourished, both are considered "no murder". One advantage of these shelters is that they are aiming to keep animals alive at home. Those who do not support killing will support these types of shelters. Because they do not euthanize old animals or unused animals. When the evacuation centers are full, they will not euthanize the animals. Euthanasia is reserved for those considered to be in danger and / or serious condition. Animals in innocent evacuation centers are generally more healthy and vitality.