Why did King Charles I Resort to Personal Rule in 1629

Why did Charles I relied on personal control in 1629? Personal rules emerged when Charles I dissolution of the Diet in 1629. This is the symbol the king believes that joint administration of the country is impossible. From the time of Charles control, the relationship with Congress was very bad. However, the time to the beginning of a personal rule, or sometimes referred to as "tyranny of eleven years", indicates a valley. Therefore, for reasons that Charles began to carry out "personal rules", there are errors in this.

Between 1629 and 1640, due to the absolute rule of Charles I there was considerable friction between the British parliament and the king. When the Congress convened by Charles in 1640 refused to grant a grant to suppress Scotland's rebellion, conflict occurred. The Irishmen caused a rebellion in the second year and by 1642 the tension between Charles and Congress led England's civil war. In 1649, Congress won, Charles I was executed, England became a republic and a protectorate under the rule of Oliver Cromwell. These changes redefine the relationship between the American colony and the British, as the new government under Cromwell is about to integrate control over overseas territory.

England in the 17th century was politically unstable and religious persecution. The controversy between British people began at Stuart during the reign of Charles I (1629-1640). Charles I and the kings of France, Spain and Germany founded an absolute monarchy (Cheney 419). Charles I dissolved parliament in 1629 and reigned for 11 years without parliament. Charles I is a member of the British National Church and ignores the various Christian sects persecuted by the British Church (Cheney 419).

On March 2, 1629, the Diet passed three resolutions to condemn the King's fiscal policy and religious policy after remembering the speech of the House of Representatives for the first time Charles I was already disappointed in Congress . Eight days later, Charles dissolved Parliament and began the era of regime known as "personal rule" without parliament. In order to make the religious integration of the three countries more reliable, Charles I ordered to publish a new prayer book in Scotland. When the angry crowd protested the book at St. Giles' church in Edinburgh, this was a serious failure cried out "The masses will come to us!" - negative for Catholic reintroduction Mention