Why did Fanon Argue for a Violent Struggle Against Colonialism?

In the latter part of the 20th century, the process of colonization began in Asia first, then in Africa. In 1949, India was one of the first countries to gain independence, followed by Myanmar, Malaysia, and Ceylon. In Africa, colonization began in a few years, initially in Libya and Egypt, then in other parts of the continent of Africa. The main colonists are Britain and France. History shows that the United Kingdom succeeded in achieving colonization in peace, and France faced more problems in abandoning colonies, against colonialists and colonists It brought many conflicts.

French farmers arrived in Algeria when the colony was trying to fight a totally fierce struggle with the French. He was shocked by the racial discrimination of Algerians and the difference between the living standard of European colonial times and the population of indigenous Arabs he witnessed. He has a close relationship with the poor in Algeria and has researched and studied patients using group therapy. There is also confusion of intellectuals. One of the wonderful events of 1954 is Islamic homes issued by Algerian social philosopher Malek Bennabi. To catch up with the outbreak of the Algerian Revolution, the Islamic House proposed the fundamental concept of 'colonialism': the historical process of the decline of culture and intelligence in Algeria and other Muslim countries.

However, Fanon and Mao have differences in their attention to the conceptualization of violent struggle. Fanone chose to analyze the essence of the colonial regime, and it is believed that he is inherently violent and affects individual colonial subjects (physical and physiological). The reason for his violence is rooted in the understanding of violence as a power to liberate colonial people (literally or symbolically). By contrast, Mao's emphasized the role of violence as a tool of political power, so his research not only provided reasons for guerrilla warfare, but also on how to carry out such behaviors according to Mao Zedong's own guerilla experience We also offered advice. In short, Fannon prove the rationality of violent struggle mainly using existentialist terms, but Mao uses a more dexterous theory to carry out a violent revolution.