Why did the analysis of the origins of A.J.P. Taylor's World War II caused this controversy among historians? It is widely believed that the Second World War began in 1939 for Hitler's worldwide reign; many historians confirmed this before A.J.P. Taylor announced his work "The Origin of the Second World War" in 1961. A. J. P. Taylor is the first historian who considered war with a completely open mind and makes people regard their origin as a moral problem rather than a political problem.
The Spanish Civil War led to the Second World War - most historians believe the Spanish Civil War is a prelude to World War II. A famous revisionist, AJP Taylor, has a different perspective (in his classic work "The Origin of the Second World War") - he said the Spanish Civil War was "great for the Second World War "He also believes that British and French obedience policy" is not the policy of Hitler and Mussolini, the outcome of the Spanish civil war, but British and French policies, or lack thereof. The Republic may have more resources and more popular support. It will win if it is treated correctly under international law: legitimate government external weapons, no rebels. If both sides receive foreign aid or both are rejected, it can even win.
British historian AJP Taylor said in a book entitled "The Origin of the Second World War" that other countries should join armed groups in 1933, "In the book of constitutional means to hold power, Germany I gained the support of the majority of the people. " "(Doc.8) Taylor believes that Czechoslovakia would have been more secure if more countries were involved in the issue.He also said that since Germans have the power to hold him, Germany I believe it is the only person who can "end" (Document 8). He also said that "pacifier" is concerned that German failures involve Russian rule over the majority of Europe (Doc. 8), and many people are reluctant to do so. Third, at the origin of the Second World War, Keith Yu Bank believed that blocking Hitler before 1939 is not a problem for several reasons. Eubank also said the French are "afraid to repeat bloody sacrifices of 1914 - 1918." British want to appease Hitler