Like Samuel Gregg in the 1790s, why does information source A from Styal Mill's studio show that children seem to be the best and most suitable workforce for factory owners? According to Samuel Greg, child labor has many important advantages for children and Styal Mill itself. The source provides us with a series of virtual reasons that will help explain why they prefer child labor. This attitude is explained by economic rationality. Because by hiring information source A you can read Greg 's own economic interests.
Because the workers are short and the kids need small and flexible fingers, the children need to work at all the factories. The poor disciples of Styal provided an apprentice house with administrator and his wife to take care of them. Unlike other factories, poor apprentices may have to sleep near the floor of the factory or near the owner of the factory. In the apprenticeship house, two beds separate men's and boys' lodgings. At another factory with apprentices, I did not distinguish between boys and girls, and I did not let anyone take care of them.
. . The first factory was placed in a creek to provide the necessary labor by importing a large quantity of poor children from a studio in a large city. Since the establishment of the Hanway Act of 1767, London is an important source of information, as the number of children in the studio has increased significantly and the parish authorities are keen to liberate from the burden of maintenance. . . . For parish authorities plagued by many unwelcome children, the new cotton factories in Lancashire, Derby, and Knot are angels. (Four)
In this area, some children receive valuable skills training. In Shrewsbury, the boys were placed in a studio studio, but the job of girls was to rotate, to do gloves and other work "according to gender, age, ability". On the site's St. Martin Island, the children were trained in linen spinning, hair picking, wool's carded hair training, then treated as disciples. The studio is also related to the local industry, and in Nottingham the children working at the cotton factory earn about 60 pounds per year in the studio. Some educational advertisements are apprenticeships and are willing to pay to all employers ready to provide them. Such an agreement is more desirable than assisting children in the studio: children of apprentice are not subject to justice examination, so reducing the likelihood of being punished for negligence; apprentices and apprentices are better It can be seen as a long-term educational method You can educate children who may not be interested in work