Why Abortion is immoral

According to the Marquis, it is morally wrong to kill a person who has the right of life, because it robs this future existence.

"The purpose of this article is to compromise the general belief that any discussion on ethics can show that abortion is very immoral and that it will kill it, Claimed adults also have the same morality.

If you choose to abort a child your mother does not want and steal his / her future children, you never know what that child can do.

At the beginning of his debate, he explained the typical arguments of advocates and anti-abortors.

Entity's lifetime begins at the moment of conception, or the fetus looks like a baby, or the fetus has the genetic code, it is necessary and sufficient for human beings.

Example The fetus is not a human, or the fetus is not a rational agent, or the fetus is not a social creature.

When someone kills someone, their life will not prematurely end, then he will take away everything he or she evaluates.

These include goals, achievements, completed projects, human relationships, experience, etc.

The value of the victim changes as life goes on. Therefore, he or she will not only be deprived of what they are currently being evaluated, but will also be deprived of future value.

2) People with AIDS and cancer know that they are dead, thinking that death is very bad for them. It is a bad thing.

If one person can not cure with a very sick, he will face a painful future.

A person can not have the right to live, unless it wishes to exist explicitly and because the fetus does not evaluate it in such a way that they can not have the right to live.

Why abortion is immoral, Don Marquez is an article claiming that abortion is morally wrong and uses discussion to explain the reason. He insists that many of us will agree that killing people is wrong, and you should have this view of abortion if you believe. If you think that killing is wrong, you think that all killings are wrong, and whether the person is a 1 year old or 30 year old fetus, the biological state of that person is different There is none. Then he explained that the killing is not only immoral but also explains that it is wrong because it deprives the victims of life and the pleasures that people may have experienced. (Marquis, 189). Given a situation, Marquis agrees that killing is acceptable in some cases, but is still unethical.

Tang Marquis wrote the article "Why abortion is immoral". He feels that abortion is morally wrong and deprived of life by acting alone. His argument is based on this assumption. "From the perspective of the moral value of life, the assumption that a particular abortion is immoral is extremely strong, if the fetus belongs to the same category as an adult This estimate is more attractive than women's rights It can only be overturned by consideration. "His article does not address these considerations. Things to consider are abortion before implantation, abortion where women's life is threatened by pregnancy, or pregnancy after rape. He is opposed to intentional abortion, which is his discovery of immoral behavior.

The argument that pregnancy abortion can not be believed to be unethical and legitimate depends on speculation that it is much bigger than immoral act of forcing pregnant women for long-term birth. Otherwise, autonomy of pregnant women will become a universal moral problem. The most common way to make this moral judgment is to identify abortion as homicide. Infringement of personal autonomy is wrong, murder is wrong. For most people, homicide agrees even worse (although this is a more challenging problem if infringement of autonomy is slavery against movable property). The argument that the law prohibits abortion relies on the widely accepted concept that states should legally prohibit murder. If abortion = homicide hypothesis does not exist, pregnancy abuse is significantly weaker than claims that pregnant women are forced to take for a long time.