Who would win in a fight: lion, tiger, or bear?

What kinds of beasts will win with a fatal battle like the king of the jungle, the furiously striped cat, or a murderer without god (aka bear)? In other words, who is the ultimate carnivore? Follow the spirit of the recent NCAA basketball tournament, let's see

First of all: the lion and the tiger. Some people say that it can do anything, but if you look closely it is actually a tiger. Indeed, the cage between Lion and Siberian tiger in 1960 showed that the lion would normally win. But when the cruel promoter starts using Bengal tiger, the most aggressive wild cat, it is a tiger. Lions have no chance. More importantly, tigers are larger than usual and carry larger bars (cough, their huge fangs)

Next: Lions and bears The Californians of the 19th century did a well-documented animal fight, including a struggle between the lion and the bear. As a result, Lions bravely came to Grizzlies, but Bears used big claws to kill them as a 200 pound club. To be fair, the weight of the lion is much lower than that of the bear, but the tiger is also so. Let's see who is the champion of the winner

Final match: Tiger and Bear. The latest simulation of the Discovery Channel supported the bear in victory, saying that the tiger could not penetrate the bear's skin. However, I discovered the use of the more robust Siberian Tiger brand, not the dark creatures that were destroyed by the Bengal tiger. Wild studies showed that Tiger wins with rare conflict. For example, Russian scientists are said to have recorded a bear bear whose skin was stabbed by a smaller Siberian tiger's teeth. Tigers are known to kill crocodiles (thicker raw bear than bear) and even wild adult bears, as the tigers are exposed to violent attacks. So, who do you believe: simulated battle or actual battle?

Tigers often win. Lions occasionally win these fights, but they are very few. None of them (they can make such an argument?) Will not fail, but all the evidence seems to support Tiger's most likely winning, not Lion. There is no difference if this is a captured tiger and a lion, or a wild tiger and a lion. When both are caught, they are all under the same social pressure and benefits. Prison wrestlers may not be able to practice with his brother, but prisoners' warriors can not practice hunting and game defeat. They have the same obstacles to captives, but tigers almost always prevail. This has no significant impact on results

At the South Perth Zoo in 1949, in the 3 - minute fight between Lion and Tiger, the Lion killed the tiger. There was a quarrel when the tiger reached for the contact shoot. The lion grasped the throat of the tiger, dragged it through the opening, and killed it before the breeder arrived. In September 1951, at the zoo in Madras, India, a 18 year old "Vikram" tiger entered and fought against the 7-year-old Leo called Leo. Vikram, which was included in the femur, fell to the cage and died despite medical treatment.

British Lion teacher John Smith Clark, in a speech about the battle between the tiger and the Lion of the Glasgow Zoological Association, shows the actual battle on the screen, "Tiger is always 100. It's more agile and moves It is not as clumsy as it is as well as powerful and equally armed but is fighting in various ways: "Animal trainer and performer who keeps some tigers, lion, hyena and other exotic animals , Clyde Beatty, 9 out of 10 adult lion whipping the adult tiger. " He began to mix these animals first, he said that his 25 tigers (2 of them were Siberian tigers, the rest were Bengal tigers) were killed at the circus stage, but none of them had died It was.