Who Rules America: Wealth Distribution

I have heard that politicians and executives need a powerful middle class. Then, you may be surprised to hear that "About 82% of US net assets belong to the top 20%, the next 80% own only 18% of the US" (UCSC). Some may argue that this unbalanced capitalist beauty is an opportunity to build an empire. I think the ratio is unfair. Why "Is the average CEO has 350 times more income from the employee" (UCSC)?

In the United States, this wealth distribution is more inclined to income distribution. For example, the United States has 100 countries, and all assets (housing, land, financial assets) in this country are represented by 100 circles. In 2010, Michael Norton and Dan Ariely investigated more than 5,500 employees and looked at how they thought they should distribute wealth domestically. So, until the end of distribution?

Asset allocation represents how assets are allocated to one national or multiple countries. If wealth is evenly distributed, everyone in the world has the same amount of money and food. In starving games, the distribution of wealth is very heterogeneous. The Parliament has most of its wealth and many other fields are very poor.

At that time, Pareto was studying wealth in various countries. As he was an Italian, he first analyzed the distribution of Italian wealth. To his surprise, he discovered that about 80% of Italian land is owned by only 20%. Like the pea sheath in his garden, most resources are managed by a few players. When he continued his study, Pareto discovered that the number was never the same, but the trend was very consistent. Most of the reward seems to always result from a small group of people. The idea that several things occupy the majority of the results is called the Pareto principle, or more generally the 80/20 rule.