Who is Responsible for Military Robots’ Lethal Actions?

I) Introduction Robotics enables US military to use autonomous robots (or unmanned systems, UMS) in modern warfare. In the war with Iraq, the US military sent 12,000 terrestrial robots (P. W. Singer) at the end of 2008. One of the most popular robots used in Iraq is an unmanned ground vehicle, iRobot Packbot, which can detect and destroy improvised explosive devices. Developing robots in war can save lives of many human soldiers. In addition, the robot is faster, more durable, more accurate, and resistant to chemical weapons and biological weapons (Ronald Akin). In the 2001 defense law, the United States

Military robots, especially deadly autonomous robot weapons, are located in the center of the robot. Supporters of war robots say that these robots have great benefits including saving soldiers' lives under the influence of emotion, anger, fatigue and revenge and including moral and effective behavior of human soldiers thinking. It reacts too much, and it may exceed the law of war. Opponents of automatic killing robots believe that the autonomy of weapons itself is a problem and that autonomous control of weapons alone is not enough. Their central belief is that they must completely ban their own deadly robots. War ethics tries to solve the legitimacy and mistakes of public policy debate about individuals, countries or countries, and ultimately leads to the formulation of war laws 26, 27.

Countries and companies around the world simultaneously develop automatic robots for police and military applications. Unmanned reconnaissance aircraft spread widely around the world, killing a fatal payload. At the moment, the decision of killing is determined by human beings, but in the future the artificial intelligence system may make such a decision and there is a reason to believe that these robots are used for murder. Those who read Isaac Asimov recall that this directly violates his three robotic laws. "Robots do not hurt human beings or do not harm human beings and must obey instructions given by humans. Unless these orders conflict with the first law, unless these robots keep themselves There is a contradiction of the law "In my opinion these are very good laws and every country in the world should immediately enact laws.