Who Has the Right to Take a Life?

Who has the right to live life. Compliance with the correct code of conduct or ethical values ​​reflects the personal view of life. Morality separates the boundary between good and evil. When you state your opinion about the death penalty, it flows in one direction immediately. The death penalty, introduced in the world judicial system in the early stages, became a punishment for those who committed crimes of morally expressible crime. Although the lives of many people have been deprived, this challenging behavior is a controversial topic still in contemporary American society.

There are few controversial issues like euthanasia in medical ethics. In this topic, questions are raised as to who has the right to live and under what circumstances. In addition, we examine the conditions that people are dead or are considered to be of no quality of life. When most people think about euthanasia, they only think about death. Even though it may be beneficial from time to time, death is usually considered to be negative. People who are influenced by religion, media, and wrong messages often attack euthanasia. Indeed, euthanasia provides a way for humans to alleviate their suffering if they are incapacitated and incurable. Many people are suffering due to the current illegal acts. Legislation and acceptance of euthanasia will benefit humanity

Normally discussion is developed around the right of life, supporters of euthanasia believe that euthanasia infringes on the basic right of their life. What they did not see is our "life" as a human being means death. Without death, our definition has no "human life". Like both sides of black and white or coins, human life does not die. Therefore, for those who believe that everyone has the basic life right, they unconsciously agree that everyone has the basic right to die.