When is Suicide Morally Permissible or Morally Required?

For the purposes of this article, assume that there is neither life nor God. Elimination of the concept of God in a sense can solve the problem of sin and criticism. Therefore, the relativist position will be adopted and the absoluteist position will be rejected. Embarrassing problems should also be solved, as it can be said that a soldier is not a coward and few people can hurt him / herself. As a movement of reasonable philosophical thinking, the forfeiture of life can be divided into three categories, as an act with boundaries banned by law, and finally as a theological act.

Regardless of the morality and tolerance of suicide, suicide can lead to death, so there is a question as to whether or not to worry about death naturally. In his 1970 influential article called Death, the philosopher Thomas Nagel (b.1937) solved this problem: if death is a permanent end of our existence it is evil Is there? What? Because death deprives us of our lives it is evil or no one can experience this deprivation so it's just a blank. Therefore, if death is evil, it is not based on any positive attribute it has, it is based on what it robs us, life. For Nagel, regardless of the balance between its good and bad elements, it has intrinsic value in the naked experience of life.

When asked if you are morally permitted to commit suicide, we must first define suicide. There are three types of suicide, the first is to deliberately endanger the human life. The second thing is to intentionally stop the person's life intentionally by positively or by taking the necessary measures to protect others's lives, and finally to deliberately endanger the person's life intentionally . Thus, this may mean that morality allows or does not allow suicide, but depending on the type of suicide in progress it will mean that it may be indirect. Many of us were expecting about suicide and its tolerance. This is sometimes the cause of religion, law, and even the way the media is drawn. We talk about stories here a lot, but we must consider that most of us do not know how to end their lives. Therefore, it is difficult to answer this question immediately.

For liberals, suicide is morally acceptable as individuals have the right to commit suicide. Liberalism has a historical precedent of Stoic and Schopenhauer, and it is closely related to the "antipsychotic" movement in the past half century. (Of course, suicide is not necessarily rational or prudent). According to the campaign, attempts by the state or medical community trying to intervene in suicidal behavior are essential mandatory attempts to enable individual moral freedom movement (Szasz 2002)