What We’re Reading: William Cronon, “The Trouble with Wilderness”

For many environmentalists, it seems that this is a heretic claim, as the concept of the wilderness has existed for decades.

Basic principle - in fact, passion for environmental movement, especially in America. For many Americans, the wilderness is the best antidote to human self. As Henry David Thoreau once said, "wildlife is the protection of the world."

However? (Kron, "Click here for the full text of" Worry in the Wilderness, or returning to the wrong nature ")

In "Wilderness in the wilderness or returning to the wrong nature", environmental historian William Cronnon challenged the concept of the wilderness - the concept of the nature held by most American environmentalists . It is believed to exist in addition to humans and society; the influence of humans is untouched, primitive. He pointed out that this understanding of the wilderness is actually a cultural structure, which includes a romantic fusion of ideas, introduced at the forefront of American environmental debate after the Industrial Revolution. Cronon believes that by changing the concept of the wilderness to a place where no mankind exists, that is, "where", we will leave a small space to find a "moral, sustainable, glorious" place for ourselves I will. The idea of ​​the wilderness is separated from understanding of human dependence and interaction with the natural world - opens the door to the result of irresponsible and destructive environment

Is Cronon correct? Should we try to redefine the wilderness as being created by human culture? If we remove this concept, can we find a space to realize a new relationship in nature and find ways to live more harmoniously with people other than human beings?

In the past few decades, when our world ceased to be stopped, the wilderness proved to be the only independent retreat for civilization to escape. In William Kron 's "Wilderness trouble" or returning to the wrong nature, he says that the definition of the wilderness has changed fundamentally to us. Today, we define wild concepts as natural areas, probably cottages, resorts, or national parks. In his article, Cronon believes that our society is wrongly viewing the wilderness, which reminds us that this is not the case in history. He believes that our view of the wilderness is not natural. Because our interpretation for it changed from a barbaric life to a safe hideout. Our society definitely needs to protect our land from human activities. But the idea of ​​cloning is that everyone is committed suicide, the only way we can protect nature from human activities.

Second opinion against WILDERNESS: Overview of WILLIAM CRONON "WILDERNESS failure, or naturally returned wrong paper sample"

"Turning back to the wilderness of the wilderness or the wrong character" Environment historian William Cronnon challenged the concept of the wilderness most American environmentalists have. Some of human beings and society, those not affected by human beings, primitive ones. He pointed out that this understanding of the wilderness is actually a cultural structure that includes a romantic fusion of ideas introduced at the forefront of American environmental discourse after the Industrial Revolution.