What the Government Should do About Animal Testing

I scanned my key card, walked through a pair of double doors past the laboratory and the stamped door of organic waste. I entered the maze of a complicated and complex dark corridor. Door reading dog test, pig breeding laboratory and primate test environment. Looking at the dark room, you can see the cage where you kept chimpanzees. The only purpose in this field is animal experiments. This area is the safest area on campus, with independent docks and security cameras in every corner.

Should I stop animal experiments? Practice of animal experiments has many advantages and disadvantages. Unfortunately neither party, including the public, government and scientists, can not make everyone happy. Animal testing is a process that has been going on for centuries for a variety of reasons; finding drugs and treatments to improve health and medicine. Many medical treatments including cancer, HIV drugs, insulin, antibiotics, vaccines and the like have been achieved through animal experiments. - The use of animal morals aimed at human entertainment has long been a matter of division, polarization, and a clear solution. Discussion on this issue often raises questions about human moral responsibility for animals and thus whether animals should receive the same ethical treatment with humans.

Most scientists and governments say animal experiments should minimize animal pain and animal experiments should be done only when needed. "Three R" is a guideline for using animals for research in most countries. An alternative to animals, an alternative to animal experiments, is one of the principles, but they are much wider. Although these principles have been welcomed by several animal welfare organizations, they are also criticized for the fact that current research is outdated and there is little practical effect in improving animal welfare I will.