In this article, the view of Schopenhauer's beauty and sublime beauty thinks that the "dialectical" interpretation shows how to homogenize the two aesthetic concepts and reduce the difference between them only by quantity . There is a difference. My critical analysis reveals some of the important tensions in Chopinhauer's own aesthetic theory - it ultimately failed to "unify" Plato and Kant's method - stage interpretation moral Non-profitable redemption to
The importance of transcendence of Maharishi's aesthetic skills is very important. First, Veda Aesthetics offers a theoretical foundation and practical skills to maximize the possibility of aesthetic reactions. Secondly, this aesthetic includes the body and explains the dynamics between it and the heart, and shows how they cooperate to create aesthetic happiness. Third, as an aesthetic one that systematically covers the experience of all states of consciousness, it will explain the different description of the aesthetic response. Finally, Maharishi replied that aesthetic transcendence is an objection to the withdrawal from the world. Morally, this aesthetics can only be completed in a higher conscious state than an individual can act from outer space rather than selfish need (1975 b)
In the 1920s and early 1930s America there was a civilization that turned into automation. The influence of machinery on art and architecture reflects the explosion of machines as a valuable indicator of aesthetics. Functionalism and mechanical aesthetics both influenced modern architecture. Since the arrival of the machine is very radical, it can be legally referred to as machine age in the past as described below. Among the great people of cultural change that appeared in this new era, mechanical aesthetics were introduced in the field of architecture and design. This is very important for modern exercise. Because it provides institutions that practitioners can appeal in the spirit of the times they believe. Mechanical aesthetics can be distinguished in each piece of the protagonist of Modernism Pantheon; therefore it limits the full range of modernist activities.