I will take a different approach to this problem. Most respondents are dealing with civilian potential violations, and I think they have firmly pinned them.
This is very important in the United States as it is directly related to the Constitution. The constitution itself determines the authority of the federal government. The first 10 constitutional reforms are the "rights bill", which explains certain restrictions on government power. Please imagine if the Bill of Rights is being ignored by the government. You may be imprisoned as opposed to the government, forced to attend church, or imprisoned. Your gun can be confiscated for no reason. Your house may be forfeited by soldiers or police. You may be intercepted without a reason and be bound indefinitely. You may be under torture. wait
My favorite modification is the 4th fix. This is a nice overview. Fourth revision of the US Constitution
For your question, this is essentially a value proposition, imagine the following scenario. Suppose there is a methyl lab in the basement. This is hidden and as far as we know no doubt warns any neighbor or law enforcement agency. One day your old cat went out to climb your window. She called the police to rescue the cat. Go into your house from the window and find a cat, and find your methyl lab. Obviously, they are waiting for you to go home and arrest you.
The usual response to this is "You can not have methyl labs". The man pulled the taillight and there was a kilogram heroin on the trunk. The man stopped on the street without a reason and found cocaine in his pocket. wait
But the problem is this. If we did not implement the fourth revision under such circumstances, where is the underline drawn? If something is found for the first time after the fourth revision is violated, is it really not authoritative? Should the police be allowed to enter your home without a warrant or possible cause? Should the police be allowed to look for minor traffic violations in your car or look for pocket contents?
So what is the importance of observing the law against your problem? Legislation, citizens and governments, in general respecting them, that is, setting social standards and complying with the law. If no one obey the law, it makes no sense. Therefore, participating in compliance with the law will help to prove to society that the law is valid.
Our people should comply with the laws enacted by the federal government, but the Federal bureaucracy should observe the laws imposed on them by the citizens - the constitution - as a prerequisite for the existence of the federal government Please remember. This is the reason the Constitution is called the highest law of land - this is the law the Federal bureaucrat should follow. In their view, this principle often confuses Americans, as the federal government and the American people are the same person. Therefore, as some of our ancestors did in the Bill of Rights, if someone sees the federal government and the private sector as two distinct and different entities, it is confusing.
So what is the importance of observing the law against your problem? Legislation, citizens and governments, in general respecting them, that is, setting social standards and complying with the law. If no one obey the law, it makes no sense. Therefore, participating in compliance with the law will help to prove to society that the law is valid.
Human behavior has very important rules. If we comply with this law, we will hardly get into trouble. In fact, if you are in compliance with the law it will bring countless friends and certain happiness to us. However, we are in violation of the law, at the moment we are classified as infinite trouble. The law is as follows. Always make others feel important. Sadly, part of is that most of their irrational feelings of accomplishment tend to strengthen their shows with shudder and conceit. As Shakespeare places it, "...... Man, proud man, / with authority with easy meditation, / ...... Heaven regenerates such magical tricks Before / / angels weep. "