What´s Deconstruvist Architecture?

Constructivistic theory is aimed at creating structures that show distortion and misalignment of typical building elements such as unpredictability, confusion, structure etc. in a controlled environment in building practice. This design principle pushes the limits of traditional building practices related to structural practicality and focuses mainly on the externalities of buildings. Although influenced by Derrida's philosophy and interest in radical formalism, practitioners of demolition acquired their physical influences from the geometric anomalies of Russia's constructivism, and the "fantasy" spell .

Deleuze's project is to think, think about ways to think, think about it at the same time, or do it, regardless of whether it works with Fixix Guattari or alone. What is the current state of philosophy in architectural philosophy or philosophical architecture? Is that Deleuze's work was offered to rethink the architecture? Or, in other words, it makes sense. Is architecture an objection to Druze's efforts? There may be something like the Deleuze architecture, perhaps the same way -

The basic questions about the nature of architecture inspired many of the philosophy of modern architecture: what kind of corporate architecture; the building has basic characteristics; what does the architect do? It is not in the form of art, never, the building is different from other art forms (if any), and whether the building contains all the building structures. One way to master the essence of architecture is to define it according to discipline. We may accept the disciplinary determinism of British architect Cedric Price: "Architecture is done by the architect". Defining architectural discipline and practice seems to be a simple empirical event.

Buildings other than people and people What we usually call "architecture" is human architecture. This raises the question of whether human buildings can absorb the structure of more kinds of animals. It also suggests that humans' architecture, including subsidence patterns, individual structures, and constructed community environments, can be evaluated from the perspective of ecology, animal behavior and evolution (Hansell 2007). If these are the fundamental strengths to understand human architecture, regardless of whether they are focused on aesthetics, practicality or other problems, we will compare all ongoing explanations to the corresponding biology It is necessary to translate into terms. One way to resist this movement is to mark human architecture as a human influence, especially as a human effort and creation - perhaps by reference to intent - an aesthetic focus