What quality does a person lack who cannot understand another's point of view?

I am looking for a word that is not a slang but a spoken word - to be precise, I can use this word when speaking with a professional therapist / counselor

Another way of asking this question may be "to fill in the quality of commentators (or self-centered)?"

For example, a child stole a bicycle from another child. Children's parents asked the child why they stole it, and the child answered "I like it." The parent asks the child "Anyone who likes you other than me", but the child can not get the answer. What qualities are lacking for this child?

At first I thought about emotionally correct "sympathy". But I am particularly interested in this at a reasonable level - I can not understand others' thinking process, available data, cultural influences etc, and certain conclusions, decisions or actions Or I can not understand why it is right for her. Therefore, sympathy (or perhaps sympathy) intellectual or reasonable equivalents may also work here.

After all, I do not say that I can not approve of or support others' opinions, but I can not understand why they understand such things. This might seem like a lack of analytic skills, but I know that people have such a very high ability to analyze and reason in other ways.

I am most interested in the lack of quality of such people, but I would like to welcome descriptive words from individuals other than "ego centric" and "monologist".

"Quality of dialogue" of the inner language is important for understanding our true self. Professor Charle Fernyhough of Durham University says: "This dialogue has very special qualities, including opinions and opinions on behalf of others, it is very powerful, understand." "Another ruminant you want to stop listening to It is like being troubled repeatedly to bit a sad experience or a conversation.We do not intentionally repeat the memory of sorrow.But if you fall into a trap of contemplation, I know more and more to help you ignore this ineffective reaction.

In most cases, it is difficult to see problems from the viewpoint of others. Just because we do not understand it does not mean we have to abuse ourselves, we do not hate each other. If you want, you can get a better picture of it before you comment. Or better, you do the same thing in other ways. So why are you complaining? You see a stolen person, you start a new episode about him / her. Talking along the way, you forgot that you recently received extra credits for the task you just completed it, you have not got it. For the sake of fairness, you two have been stolen. Please take something that is not yours. So who is terrible?

Articles, news, and media lack a diverse view of the damage to the public. Human identity is important to understanding their world, but it does not define who they are. In order to better understand the world, we need to hear unique voices and opinions. Regarding important issues and topics, I ignore the views of the stranded people.

Does the perspective need to be consistent? Yes, this is not to say that it can not move, it can be consistent by the authority of the narrator, for some reason the talker can move from one angle to another, losing direction There is none. Please do not do. In any scene, the perspective changes, but the narrator does not change. He ran early in the morning and floated like a ghost in the high and wet pine tree in the Wisconsin forest. His thick hair rolled from the fog. His lungs are burned. He drank beer and cigarettes at once. On the way he stopped his glasses and wiped it off with a relaxed sweatshirt. In late June, wet, cold spring does not yield way in summer.