Public type and communication: Messages have three types of public information. Messages that have been thought of like you, you can only enhance common ideas, ideas that are not like you, that is the possibility of change. People who tend to think about your thoughts
People who oppose specific ideas will rarely change their ideas unless they are asymmetric. This is a formal knowledge exchange relationship between teacher and student, or father and son.
We need to review the possibility of success. I am not 100% sure about this, but it is said that a speech should attract you to persuade you and touch you. If either of these two are missing, chances of success are few.
I learned why people believe in things, what factors change people's minds, and why they never do so if they face overwhelming evidence. Cognitive dissonance is the mechanism we use to accept or refuse new ideas. It may be a very powerful obstacle to convince others that our position is correct. Cognitive dissonance is the source of all trapped minds. Moral and immoral - there are many ways. I am more concerned about moral persuasion.
There are many psychological terms, "motivational reasoning", "confirmation of prejudice", and "cognitive discord" in the fact that people do not want to change their own ideas. But you do not need academic semantics is that it is very difficult to try to make someone see things in their own way if they go into discussions from different perspectives . While arguing as much as possible, I refute the facts, but that fact seems not to bring you anywhere. The wall of opinion of the opponent does not move. They do not seem to want to move it
Scientists can change their own thoughts the same way as others. Changes in their minds may be slightly different than most people change their minds. As scientists change their mindset, the idea of the whole group may change. The reason why scientists change their minds is different from the reason why ordinary people change their minds. Due to new evidence, scientists may change the weather of their thoughts, and ordinary people may change their thoughts.
Regrettably, when humans make decisions about something, they often do not change it - even if they face the opposite fact. "This is not very scientific," Musk said. "This is called physics and this scientific method is really effective in understanding the facts." 4. Based on the actual situation, whether these axioms are correct, related, and What is its probability? I am trying to counter the conclusion. Seek refutation from others to help break further your conclusion. If no one can invalidate your conclusion, you may be right, but you are definitely right.