What is the thesis to "The Battle of the Ants"?

Red ants and black ants are taken to "Republicans (colonists) and ambitions (Britons)" Walden compares insects against humans:

For numbers and the Holocaust, it is Austerlitz or Dresden. Battle of Concord! The two were killed by a patriot and Luther Blanchard was hurt! Why all ants here are "fire! For God's fire!" - thousands of people shared the fate of Davis and Phosmer (two colonists were killed) ... As with our fathers, this is no doubt the principle they are fighting for, the outcome of this fight will be for the people involved in the battle of Bunker Hill. Important and memorable, at least

Clearly, Thoreau emphasizes the importance of people fighting in "principles". His earlier irony was that he compared the red ants in battle against the Spartans who told the mother to win or die their sons: "The slogans of their fight are obviously conquests" death. "

There is no other reason to study red and black ants, they hate each other, or some person taxes others, so Walden's paper is about wasteful discussion and waste of war and terrible life We get the argument.

I did not know the cause of the war which side won, but on that day I felt excited and felt pain, witnessing thorns, ferocity, and human fighting massacres in front of my house.

Whether he eventually escaped from fighting and spent the rest of his life at some of Invalides (a veteran hospital wounded in a veteran war). I do not know, but I think his industry has not been worth it since.

Thoreau in this story tells us that the human fight eventually has no meaning. I think he is trying to argue that our battle is not different from ant battle.

I think you should see how Thoreau explains the battle that occurs between ants in detail. He believes that this fight is very important - just as he records the details of the battle he will change the history of the world. But this fight seems to be ironic as this battle will at least change what we can not distinguish.

Then Thoreau compared the fight between ants and humans. Comparing them, he seems to say that even an important battle for us is not as important as Ali's battle in a wider plan.

In writing, he pointed out the difference between human battle and ant battle. Humans will fight for material wealth, but on the other hand, ants are fighting for their principles. In the fight against ants, Thoreau referred to the "Fugitive Slave Act" which is another example of the struggle between ants and human conflicts. More importantly, Thoreau believed that armed confrontation is only related to slavery. When he saw Ali's battle, he noticed that he was not watching ant fights, not a simple fight. He took advantage of opportunities to show that the cruel struggle between life and death mimics the way of human warfare. When he extended the scope of the war he witnessed among the three ants, he called them Myrmidons, a means of quoting the images of Greek soldiers in the process of conquering all the lands.

Compared to the article by Virginia Woolf, Henry David Thoreau's "The Battle of Ants" is approaching the human life in a large-scale society by comparing ant behavior fighting our actions . This article describes Ali's battle Thoreau witnessed at his stake. He explained the battle of fierce ants, repeatedly comparing meaningless and emotionally inanimate ants with Achilles, Napoleon's great historical army and Concord patriots. As you can see from Concord's article, it is ironic to repeatedly compare the influence of ant fight against human courage and heroes. "There is no doubt that this is the principle that is fighting for their ancestors," Thoreau ridiculed the patriots and stated that the principles they are aiming are as important as the principle of small ants The author 's intention is to see through comparisons between human wars and meaningless ant behavior.