What is the role of the film viewer? The effects of narrative comprehension and viewing task on gaze control in film

Films are everywhere, but little is known about the process of attracting viewers' attention while watching the story of the movie. In fact, many film theorists and practitioners do not agree that movie stimulus (bottom up) and viewers (top down) are more important in deciding how to watch movies. Leading studies show that there is a close relationship between eye movements and understanding Although scene recognition research shows the strong influence of viewing work on eye movements, top-down control of this gaze is a mainstream movie It will be a universal control of production. The curse of the target is for ordinary reasons. Thus, in two experiments, we tested whether the relationship between eye movement and understanding is similar to Orson Welles's "Evil Touch" (Welles & Zugsmith, Touch of Evil, 1958), an example of a classic movie . It will be understood that this difference is compared to the task-based impact of more intention control of eye movement. To investigate the effect of understanding eye movements while watching a movie we start participants from different places in the movie and then manipulate the audience's understanding by tracking their eyes. Generally, the operation creates a big difference in understanding, but it only produces a difference in moderate eye movements. Task operations are designed to prioritize the features of the surrounding scenes in order to amplify the top-down impact on eye movements. This task operation creates a big difference in eye movements compared to the participants' free watching of clips for understanding. Thus, in order to enable a powerful top-down top-down control of ocular movements in a movie, task operations require the creation of features that are important for understanding the story which is unrelated to the view task. This experimental case study provides evidence that the belief of the filmmakers about the ability to create systematic gaze behaviors in the audience has been confirmed, but this is a general similar to the story of the movie It does not represent understanding.

The online version of this article (doi: 10.1186 / s 41235-017-0080-5) contains supplemental material that can be used by authorized users.

In the movie there is a theory called male gaze. Feminist movie theorist Laura Malvey created this sentence in an article called "Visual Joy and Narrative Movie" in 1975. In the movie, the line of sight belongs to the camera and the people behind it. Although the observer inherits the gaze, this is usually a positive gaze for passive women. The line of sight is not just for movies. It is evident in other forms of art, including photography. Most of the images we see on mass media, especially those depicting women, are taken by men. Men were always people taking pictures and choosing master of art. Women are always there and doing a strong job, but they do not have the same opportunity to name themselves on the spot

Male gaze - Male gaze is a concept created by feminist movie critic Laura Malvey. It refers to the way visual art develops around male audiences and explains the trend of visual culture depicting the world and women from a male perspective (via https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Male_gaze ). Concept developed by Edward W. Saeed. Compared with Europe and America, it refers to an observation emphasizing the way Arab people and culture differ exaggerated and distorted. Often we treat Arab culture as exotic, undeveloped, and sometimes dangerous things. (Via http://www.arabstereotypes.org/why-stereotypes/what-orientalism)