What is the difference between the 'Old Left', and the 'New Left'?

Briefly, before 1960 it was a liberal school, before 1960 it was a socialist, before the 1960's it was a communist. Although they are all in ideological conflict, we sometimes agree with each other and distinguish them from the era of the 1960s (and since the 1960s) and emphasize the importance of classes leading to identity politics. Old left was emphasized economic and civil rights, with the background and support of free western democracy. These include Roosevelt's New Deal liberalism, Norman Thomas style American socialism, and Western Stalinism. The old left supports social, economic justice, all human rights, and overall human rights. (This is strange as communist countries include authoritarian and communists, but many Western Communists promised reform anyway.) The old left lived in the 1960s and 1970s, but eventually failed.

The new left wing has paid too much attention to identity politics, extreme environmentalistism, and the political correctness that exists today. New left type abandoned the economic class struggle, but it may be a redundant neutralist who was strong in feminism, homosexual rights and overall tolerance. Among the new leftist factions have a strong economic vision to the old leftists, but combine it with personal computers and identity politics.

In the past decade, dialogue between old left and new left reduced settlement rather than rupture. This process clearly and clearly shows the main differences between the two exercises. These are only roughly separated along the lines between generations. There are four differences discussed here: (a) Social Roots and Orientation, (b) Political Stance, (c) Strategy and Strategy, and (d) Representative People and Forums. See other articles in this issue that are consistent with the circuit diagram provided here.

In an unprecedented range - there is now a bigger book - Iain McGilchrist shows an attractive search for differences in the brains of the left and right hemispheres and how these differences affect society, history and culture. Based on recent research on neuroscience and psychology, McGilchrist revealed that the differences are widespread. The left hemisphere is detail oriented and the right hemisphere has wider width, flexibility, and generosity. McGilchrist then pursued the history of Western culture and led the reader to show the tension between the two worlds revealed by thought and belief of thinkers and artists from Aeschylus to Magritte.

Question 2: These differences mainly from the centralism / leftist liberals (who support the EU, Democratic Party) and the rightist or leftist populist (UKIP, trumpet, dictionary etc) are mainly attributable to these Do you believe correctly? Social and economic difference Two groups? Is it accurate or useful to draw a line between wealthy influential liberalists (such as parent EU and anti-tramp) and evacuees living in poverty and globalization? This is redrawing of a critical fault line drawn between 1% and 99%, and 1% as a deflection strategy? When searching for fault lines and how to repair them, why should we pay attention to cultural hegemony, especially the intentional "perceived management" and the impact it has on our psychological and cultural conditions What?