What is the difference between retributive justice and restorative justice?

Edit: Since answering this question, a very interesting video has emerged and has been explained in a great way.

Retaliatory justice aims to "correct mistakes" by paining someone. They are suffering when someone is doing what is considered a crime. They should learn from it. People should avoid doing what they think is wrong due to punishment (threat)

Restorative justice is designed to repair "mistakes" and is considered non-constructive or unpleasant for the affected party. We are seeking ways to make progress as everyone feels that all affected political parties are faced with challenges and that we need to take care at the moment.

Many people today believe that revenge - intimidation pain - will help recovery. There is a strong reason for the opposite idea. How do people inspire humanity through threats of inhumane behavior and do the right thing? (See also: How to kill 62 people)

There are some fanatical examples on every aspect of life. And punishment usually does not produce desirable results if there is no better match with what people really want.

Non-violent communication (Marshall Rosenberg) speeds up my understanding of how to look at people and how to (actually) achieve their views

Some people think restoration justice will not be held responsible. I also dispute. But trying to regain things does not help you (very) deal with factors that are actually happening, such as mistakes, guilt, shame, create opportunities for the event to be absent and grow from there There is no indication. Although it may give the impression that it will go well after "taking time" and "paying membership fee", in many cases, it is not necessarily the case. (Reference: "FreeQuonomics")

In another module we will explore the difference between retaliatory justice and restorative justice and how these concepts relate to the formation of peace. Fatima wrote that "Restorative justice believes in criminal justice, but retaliatory justice believes that punishment is the only way punishment reduces crime and achieves justice." Victims and criminals are negotiating directly the time to resolve the dispute, but because restitution can be settled between the victim and the criminal, restoration justice can play an important role in peace I will. And you can adjust each other. "

It is important to understand that the US criminal justice system is functioning under the retaliatory judicial system in order to understand the differences in the methods brought by restorative judicial system. Retaliatory justice is based on the concept of punishment and the theory behind it is the ability to punish people who believe the state is the ultimate victim of crime and therefore believe to be a criminal. This type of judicial trial is one of the foundations for severely punishing drug-related crime and other 'innocent crimes'. Under the theory of retaliatory justice, the country is positioned as a victim

Restorative justice is based on indigenous judicial customs, is the main form of modern righteousness, restorative justice is the reaction of "attention" (or female) to "crime" compared to "justice". There is a gap between the ideal of this conference and the reality, and sympathy and open attitude towards "other people" can express and reflect on their own opinions. The existence of new expectations on behavior and the existence of a new justice norm (or language) that emphasizes "repair" - all these are the cultural elements of the small number of participants, young people acquire these factors and expectations over adults It is difficult.