What is the difference between idealism and realism?

Well, if you think that all dogs come from an ideal dog, an ideal foot, an ideal head and an ideal tail, congratulations, you belong to the Plato team - you are the idealist is!

This means that before the dog comes up, I think that there is a dog's idea that the idea of ​​the dog exists irrespective of the actual dog (in the center of the creator). The idea is eternal, and the actual dog is just a copy of the time and the poor.

That is why it is very difficult for idealists to meet. For them, everything is devoid of their idea (l). Reality can not match this idea as ideas exist perfectly beyond space and time and reality is limited by it.

But then I came to Aristotle, took the opposite position and said that the dog came first and that idea continued. Realists are those who are focused on people and are thinking about their limits.

A realist can argue that its mind must be absolutely infinite at that time, if that idea is actually the first one. However, as our experience shows, the idea is limited by reality. (Realism is based on practical experience.) You can imagine a monster with 5 faces, 12 arms, and 100 legs. But after all, they are based on reality. Because the face, arm and leg actually exist. We can not think of things that do not exist. (Idealism is the contrary, we can think of something that does not exist and what can exist.) Realist says reality first exists

This brings interesting results. The idealist may say: "But the human invention began with ideas changed to reality later." But the realist's counterargument to it is as follows: "The invention completely invented Lies will still be based on facts

This is the difference between idealists and realists. This is a picture of Plato and Aristotle. Plato refers to "Heaven - Idea", Aristotle refers to "Earth - Reality"

In order to distinguish between idealism and realism, you first have to understand these two terms thoroughly. Idealism means to imagine or see things in an ideal or perfect way. On the other hand, realism tends to make a more practical and practical view of the situation. In amateur language, these two concepts can be viewed as different views; idealism focuses on "may be" and realism focuses on "real things". The definition of these commonly accepted words is based on the philosophical usage of the term. In philosophy, when discussing perceptual problems, idealism is a theory that shows that our reality is shaped by our ideas and ideas. On the other hand, the fact that realism deals with the fact that reality has an absolute existence that is independent of our thoughts, ideas, and even consciousness.

Discussion between idealism and realism is a complex, often controversial, philosophical and ethical field. On the other hand, idealism is related to transcendental reality, which emphasizes the motivation for achieving a high level of mental concept and integrity. On the other hand, realists question the validity and practicality of idealistic ethics. To understand the basis of this argument, I have to think of the long history of Western idealism from the beginning of Platonic's ideal form. When forming a critical approach to idealism, the rise of reason, science, and secular society must also be considered. This paper argues that these two extremes can be more effectively integrated into the understanding of good aspects of idealism and realism.

Abstract This paper discusses the relationship between Heidegger's idea and traditional opposition realism and idealistic position: Heidegger's dilemma is clearly stated in section 43 of "existence and time". Heidegger 's attempt to establish a position between realism and idealism is explained in many ways, depending on the affinity of Heidegger for realism or his affinity with idealism. My argument is that Heidegger's realism and the dimension of idealism are equally important for his thinking. It is because the subjectivity is reinterpreted as "beyond self".