What is the difference between capitalism and democracy?

Most of the answers are not detailed or completely overlooked to explain how one influences another.

Capitalism is a form of government and there are many who believe that most of those who commit this mistake live in the United States. In the United States, capitalism is a type of government promoted not only by capitalists. From the moment I woke up in the morning, until I go to bed at the end of every day I'm listening to "virtue" of "capitalism". Capitalism is used as the basis for all our economic policies, and the government is fully focusing on the capitalist's own priorities. Most of the business in Congress is related to them.

In reality, capitalists control the US government. We have created laws related to banking laws, tax laws and all other domestic economic issues. In countries considered "democracy", people will think that economic policy should be explained. However, in the United States, people do not affect economic policy at all.

Therefore, considering the company's economic policy, saying that capitalism is the government of the United States to completely ignore the welfare of people for their own benefit and to let people completely escape from the decision-making process It's completely correct.

The root of this integration of government functions and corporate influence began in Europe in the 1930s and 1940s. At that time, both German and Italian executed our current version in the USA.

But "capitalism" does not exist, instead we see different 'changes in capitalism'. Today is the same as past. The degree of compatibility with democracy is different if capitalism forms are different. Democracy is fully established in Western Europe, Western Europe, Australia, Canada and New Zealand, so certain capitalism has not developed. - Tally: social, embedded, economic (usually in the form of Keynesian) stability and state regulatory capitalism. However, the political principles of general tension and equality for social and economic inequality remain unresolved. Still, the regulated labor market, the increase in economic welfare, the welfare state, the strong union, the social democracy of class consciousness or the enthusiasm of the communist (for example,

"Liberation" of financial capitalism is more concerned with the operation of embedded democracy than the capitalism and Keynesian principles prescribed by the welfare state during the first few decades after World War II means. "Acceleration" of economic and political decision-making (Zürn 1998) is closely related to the increase in social and economic inequality. They both decline the basic principles of democracy: (1) The core principle of democracy, the political decision of authority can only be taken by people legalized through constitutional democratic procedures. Asymmetric distribution is mainly the lower disadvantage of the social class. All OECD democracy is influenced by these two developments, even though there is a degree difference. Four papers will explain this core concept in detail.

Our theoretical and empirical analysis found clear and obvious tension between capitalism and democracy. It is clear that capitalism can flourish under both democratic and authoritarian regimes, but so far democracy has existed only in capitalism. However, capitalism and democracy are guided by different principles, which creates tension between them. It appears mainly in different relationships between equality and inequality. Defines a specific variant of capitalism and claims that the level of productivity and income inequality is almost incompatible with equal rights and opportunity democratic principles for political participation. Socio-economic inequality challenges equal core democratic principles of participation, representation, and governance