What is the best generic answer to the question, "why do you want to participate in the conference?"

A true academic conference should never ask such a question. I know that many organizations have recently pretended to participate in organized meetings of hotels and islands and are posing various questions.

Actual meetings organized by academic institutions only require abstracts and resumes. Other questions are unrelated and not professional

The only criteria for accepting true academic conferences is the abstract expertise and academic nature offered to the organizer.

In addition, it is the organizer of the conference, they have to answer the question, why do they want you to attend their conference? Many of the conferences do not include accommodation and travel expenses, and more meetings require entry fees. So why are you answering this question?

Although you can ask the same question and answer it according to your need. Do you really need that meeting? Did the best expert in that field participate in the meeting? Is your speech meaningful to the audience? Do you have the opportunity to contact you? If you decide to evaluate and participate in all the advantages and disadvantages of the meeting, simply submit a summary.

Therefore, please do not ask any additional irrelevant questions, focus only on the academic ability stated in the abstract, and apply for a conference to check with your resume.

When choosing an evaluation method, you need to consider formal and informal methods to answer questions, and ways to encourage participation by participants. Normally, various methods are best. Some participants acknowledge the anonymity of online surveys, others attend more attention to the informality of focus groups. Through consultation with the Internet and other organizations, you can find various evaluation tools in academic literature. Or you may have used it in the past and you may be interested in using them to measure changes. There may be many tools available for you to use. Let's start by examining the tools that can answer your question before finding the best research-aided tool. If you do not have research based tools, please use the tool that provides the most information you need.

Recommended references: Association of criminal and justice and Meghan Guevara et al. (2010), putting together various parts: a practical strategy for implementing evidence-based practice. Washington, DC: National Correctional Organization

Although you can ask the same question and answer it according to your need. Do you really need that meeting? Did the best expert in that field participate in the meeting? Is your speech meaningful to the audience? Do you have the opportunity to contact you? If you decide to evaluate and participate in all the advantages and disadvantages of the meeting, simply submit a summary.

What is the most common answer to this question "Why are you present at this conference?"

The financial conference block chain is a meeting by more than 250 financial experts and technical experts of block chain promotion. At the conference you will gain answers to various questions, learn about the best examples of block chain applications, participate in seminars, and learn how to improve your business in 2018.

Nine delegates from SONM headquarters were sent to the conference. They have set up a booth and are ready to answer questions from interested conference participants. Igor Lebedev, SONM's Chief Technology Officer and IT and Business Strategy Consultant Ilia Frankstein, attended the meeting and all of them gave a broad explanation of the mission and development of this project. Throughout the meeting, SONM was able to convey all the views on financial technology. In general, conference participants learned about SONM, a platform that can earn money from the extra computing power of hardware. This is how we change the way people use computing abilities forever.