What is the argument for censorship/political correctness?

In addition to trying to control the way people talk and think, there seems to be no reasonable argument about political legitimacy. Many people argue that political correctness is to make people use politeness, not to hurt others or insult others. This may be acknowledging that American families and parenting have failed or been destroyed. It is not an government or ideologically dissatisfied social class but an environment suitable for teaching good manners.

"From an analytical point of view, from a historical point of view, you can quickly see what it is, the political correctness is cultural Marxism from economics to cultural terminology Marxism, which is not only in the 1960s, but also in the Hippies and the Peace Movement, back to the First World War. The similarity is quite obvious when comparing the basic principles of political justification with classical Marxism. Origin of political legitimacy

What is cultural Marxism? In short, the method used to design people's specific speech, thinking, and way of behavior is quite different from George Orwell using Newspeak in his novel "1984".

"New discourse is the language of Oceania, Oceania is a fictional totalitarian state led by the party, he has created a language that meets Insoc ideology requirements News Peak - Google search

Considering what politically correctness is only a way to "promote" speaking and kindness, what will this end, or what is the result of controlling speech and thinking? Because the people say the wrong words, the idea of ​​"hints" seems a bit easier, as people are punishable, disciplined, dismissed, alienated, and even cruel, but it is never fascism.

Where is the politically correct word and the script of the following idea? If someone or organization, or some political department, wrote this and ban them, what are they and what is their motive?

There is evolution here. Every time a new day comes, words that are more politically correct or words that are deemed to be politically wrong are deleted or classified into such categories.

Not meaning all Muslims as terrorists, meaningless arguments that promote terrorist attacks, political implications of too much reflexive landslide self-censorship; aged comedians say that the phrase "joke" I am worried that I did not give a free path to me. "We can not feel that we are not living in a society where you can say what you are thinking but you can not be punished if you are in where you are and you can not accept them." His career has long He was successful, and he also advertised a documentary about gay men who did not escape from the closet before the age of 95. I am convinced that the way to discuss homosexuals in most people's life has nothing to do with this.

There are attractive philosophical points here. However, on the contrary, this central problem is used as a scarecrow. The real goal of Shriver is cultural ownership, identity politics, political correctness. This is solely about the right to use "other" stories. That is because it helps people's stories. It continues. This argument is not about how we can learn the last problem we have never experienced, but rather a long story. Indeed, a white woman is selling millions of dollars and if she did a "neat" job with a white woman's eye, she should be able to write a Nigerian young lady's experience - he was questioned or ridiculed Should not be done Anyway. It became a ridicule of those who demanded people to ask permission to use their story. It became a celebration of unlimited use of others' experiences under imaginary clothing