What is Nietzsche’s the will to power?

For Nietzsche, the will to power is the fundamental part of all reality: "The world is a will of power, nothing else" (it is the reason why everything is interpreted as ...). Matter arises from the will of atomic particles. At all appearance levels, we all find the power of work, but after all, we only encounter the appearance. Appearance is an instantiation of the will to force, power is an effective issue as it rotates the sun for the force exerted by the sun (this force is called gravity). The will of power is the will to demonstrate its effect. The earth also exerts its power on the sun. However, the earth is also composed of competitive power centers, the granite mountains are pushed up by underground magma reservoirs, and as ___ ___ ___ ___ 0 There are storm systems that collide with each other to create a tornado and some creatures that each cling to the surface of a planet with its own power center

The will to power creates effect on individuals, and they also consist of many power centers fighting for power. Those who have a lot of passion must decide what desires she suspects and incontinent persons can not control their will and can not abandon their desires. Will is a "method and measure" that determines which desires are given to them.

The will to power also explains individual groups collecting voluntarily to achieve specific goals. It is obviously enough to attract individual motivation to have the intention to abandon autonomy for this purpose.

Of course, the will to power explains the conquest of other people or people and the domination of humans in animals. This may be the most famous aspect of the will of power and the explanation of Nietzsche for the conquist seems to indicate that the conquistador is the best ideal of Nietzsche, and to some extent this It's true. However, even though he praised conquistadors and conquered the ideals of function through Nietzsche's works, including the naming of things, the ultimate ideal was autonomy. When someone becomes a leader of the state or group of people, they eventually give up on some of their power to the group, as the earth acts on the sun. What Nietzsche really argues is to withdraw from the crowd and enter the wilderness (figuratively) and to understand their inner competitive will (including the lines of a specific formation) to conquer them .

So, does Nietzsche believe in the will of power? As others point out (eg Clark 1990: 209-212), Nietzsche's initial deployment power and the principle of most of subsequent developments are inherently psychological. The will to power is considered the widest. As explained in the preceding paragraph and discussion, Nietzsche can not believe that the intention to power is the only explanation for all human behavior, although it explains various human behaviors. In a sense, he seems to accept this strong claim from time to time (see the example above). We simply have to exaggerate his situation with Nietzsche. Engage in sarcastic movements described by things - or above Clark. Of course, this will be very fortunate. Because the will to power is the only explanation and impossible for all human behavior.

In contemporary Nietzsche scholarship, Nietzsche most frequently applies it to human behavior, so some interpreters emphasized the will of power as psychological principle. However, Nietzsche's undisclosed notes (later "his will to power") released by his sister, Nietzsche sometimes considers the will of power to be more general (metaphysical) power, not just human behavior Seems like. - Make it reality. It resembles Schopenhauer's living will more directly. For example, Nietzsche claimed that "the world is a will of power - nothing else".

The will to power (German: der Wille zur Macht) is an important concept in Friedrich Nietzsche's philosophy. The will to power explains what Nietzsche may think is the main driving force of mankind - effort to reach achievement, ambition, and the best position in life. These are manifestations of intention of power; however, this concept has never been systematically defined by Nietzsche's work, and its interpretation is beginning to cause controversy. Alfred Adler put his will into his personal psychology. This is in stark contrast to other psychotherapy schools in Vienna. Siegmund Freud 's happy principle (will be fun) and Victor Frankel' s log therapy (meaning). Each of these schools advocates and teaches people a very different fundamental driving force.