What is it like to live in a modern-day monarchy?

As a rule, this is the Middle Ages. The idea that a public government position should be given to someone for their parents is vague and lacks any reasonable basis.

In fact it works very well and I think that it is better than the president of an independent election. (But not as good as both)

He is not a political figure, so he can be the official Norwegian representative.

Compared with other presidents of the United States elected other choices, I think it is better to maintain the king:

The president elected by the election tends to shift to a two party system where people choose the smaller of the two sins, rather than voting the political prospects for the preferences they prefer. (This is because there is no opportunity for a small party to actually win the presidential election)

The elected president tends to make more attention to people in politics and not to pay much attention to the political base but this is also negative. I prefer politics to politics.

Frankly speaking, I believe that even though there is a reasonable check and balance, the President often puts too much power on their hands.

I tend to abolish the monarchy, but instead there is nothing, that is, the government system we have, but there is no substitute for the top people. This will make the prime minister the chief of the government, in fact, they are already like this.

Indeed, having a king has little or no obvious disadvantage. It costed a little money. However, it does not cause inconvenience or big problems. Mastering the real power is another matter and it becomes a more important issue, but this is not what we have in Norway.

In modern Austria, Slovakia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, part of Poland, and 50 million people in northern Italy - 11 people live under the Austrian-Hungarian dual monarchy system. Bosnia and Herzegovina is the newest member to be annexed in 1908. Franz Ferdinand opposed the consolidation, opposed to meaningless provocation against them and Russia, not love for Yugoslavia. Attraction: The official independence of Serbia was recognized at the Berlin Conference in 1878. The Bosnian Serbs are dreaming of joining Serbia in large Serbia. Franz Ferdinand hated the Serbs, but they did not object to them. In fact, he was regarded as a "federalist" and supported the autonomy of the Slavic territory.

The oldest constitutional monarchy dates back to ancient times, the Hittite monarchy. They are ancient Anatolians who lived in the Bronze Age and their kings and queen must share their authority with meetings called Panku which correspond to contemporary councils and parliaments. Members of Panku are from scattered aristocratic families who represent their subjects in the federal scenery of the aides or men. In the Kingdom of England, the Constitutional monarchy was restricted by laws such as the Bill of Rights Convention 1689 and the Settlement Act of 1701 due to the glorious revolution in 1688, but the restrictions on monarchy ("Limited Monarchy") It was much faster. (See Magna Carta) At the same time, in Scotland, the Manner Treaty enacted the law of the right to claim in 1689. It imposes similar restrictions on the Scottish monarchy as well.