Who really should say what is going on? In developing the modern answer to the question "What is history", Professor Karl showed that the "facts" of history is only the fact that historians chose to consider. Millions of people crossed Rubycon, but historians tell us that only Caesar's passage is important. All historical facts come to us for the choice of interpretation of historians influenced by age criteria. But if absolute objectivity is impossible, the role of historians will never be affected; history has not lost its charm.
The car clearly expresses the correct function of historians and the importance of history in modern society.
"This is a wonderful book of entering modern philosophers and historians who are exciting and fearless, boldly lively areas, whatever they are, fear or contempt." - Isaiah Berlin, New Statesman
There are many papers and books to discuss "history" and the history of naval history, but it is easy to find. What is history and historians? What is the role of historians and history? Since the classical era, "What is military history" has obstructed discipline in this field not to mention bothering students during the first few months of academic history. According to my own observation, I constantly admire the quality, depth and breadth of the field, looking at senior scholars such as Professor Hattendorf of the US Naval War College and Professor Lambert of King's College London. This is a problem for all researchers and we should be proud of both academic and other aspects. Due to this depth and 'richness' we held half of the meetings with researchers who participated in all other sessions in other fields. You will feel like reading papers on military history and half of your blog, it's at stake
Military history is often thought not only of the history of the military but also of the history of all conflicts. Unlike the history of war, the history of the military focuses on people and war institutions, but the history of war focuses on the evolution of the war itself in technology, government and geography. Military history has many aspects. The main aspect is to learn from the past achievements and mistakes to effectively start the war in the future. The other is to create a sense of military tradition to create a coherent military force. But another possibility is to learn to prevent war more effectively. Human understanding of the military is mainly based on records of military conflict (war) and oral history, participation in military and navy, and recent air force.