Group thinking occurs not when critically thinking through the immediate problem but when the group quickly brings up unreasonable or problematic decisions. It may be promoted by a specific group agenda or simply by emphasizing harmony and consistency over group members rather than rational thinking. Individual members of the group strongly opposed the disagreement on consensus, let go of their thoughts and emotions and urge them to obey the words of leaders and other group members. In group thought, the members of the group do not question, agree or agree on consensus. Members can ignore any moral or moral result, in order to make a decision to promote their group cause. Risk taking is common in group thinking, lack of creativity and autonomous thinking can have negative personal and political significance for group members and outsiders. Collective thinking does not give very successful results
What is the collective way of thinking? There is a simple definition, is it really that simple? The term collective thinking means that members of the group tend to have the same view and belief; it often leads to mistakes. It happens often when no one knows about it. Conflict is considered a harmful element in relation to the group, but competition is effective because it helps to eliminate the group thought when considering group thinking. The explanation sounds simple, but it is more complicated than the explanation.
Group thinking is a psychological phenomenon that causes group members to make bad decisions in the face of internal pressure from the group and ignore effective alternatives. Group thinking is a common problem in groups where members do not have systems or rules for sharing their careers and making decisions. To avoid collective thinking, some organizations rely on software such as enterprise decision management (EDM) software. Group thinking is a special danger in the business world and people with similar careers tend to form management level management. When the group of decision makers are separated from the reality of daily work, they will pay more attention to the harmony of the group rather than the health of the company at once.
The term "collective thinking" was built by psychologist Owen L. Janis in the early 1970s. In 1972, Janis published his book "Victims of Collective Thinking: Determination of Foreign Policy and Psychological Studies of Fias Technology". Among them, he defined "collective thinking" as "psychological driving force to reach an agreement in any case and to suppress the dissenting opinion and the evaluation of alternatives in a cohesive decision-making group." Large scale hysteria is also known as epidemic hysteria, large-scale mental illness and mass social illness. According to a 1997 study by Johns Hopkins University Hygiene Public Health Faculty, a large-scale hysteria is a symptom that suggests organic disease, but it occurs in more than 2 without obvious reason. With appropriate belief There are some people, but their symptoms are considered "a social phenomenon involving healthy people"