Morality: Specific values and behavioral norms, in particular the code of conduct held by specific people and society
In other words, morality is completely arbitrary (d) depending on where you live and where you live. For some people they refer to religion, but over the past 50,000 years, hundreds of religions came and disappeared. For non-religious people this is the value injected by their parents plus the value they decided to adopt.
Morality also depends on species. Given that there are nearly all planets in the universe and that all planets are affected by exactly the same physics, there are other planets with intelligent living, of course, which have their own moral there is.
Finally, morality is self-employment and self-implementation. No one can stop you killing if you want. The law can later punish you, but without your own consent, it will not stop you doing something that is not ethical. When stealing money from homeless people, doing immoral things when no one is watching, who will punish you?
Many pastors should be moral, but they are hard to deal with. There are many murderers of death row prisoners who read their Bible and argue that they are moral. Many politicians (Anthony Weiner) should be moral, but ultimately should be revealed as shameful and rude
An example of moral behavior is meaningless because there is a possibility that my morality may not belong to other moral acts. Honor killing is a habit that many Muslims love, but it is meaningful for Christians, atheists, Mormons and others.
Criticism Kant's concept of "moral value" has two standard opposing opinions. (1) For example, an act is morally worthy of praise, even if it is not an act of good faith or gratitude. These actions are done from responsibility, and some actions can not be morally praised - for example someone visits a friend at the hospital because it is "this is correct" (Stocker 1976). Friedrich Schiller imitated Kant's morality and believed that people should develop hatred for his friends.
Moral philosophy is a rational study on the meaning of moral assertion and the rationale. Ethical assertions can assess legitimacy and mistakes of acts or people's roles. For example, "lying is wrong" insists that a lie is wrong and "not to be lazy" claims that personality traits (ie laziness) are wrong. Moral philosophy is usually divided into three fields: meta ethics, norm ethics and applied ethics. Meta - ethics examines the nature of moral assertions and assertions. In this part, we try to judge whether the moral assertion has a clear basic meaning (that is, to avoid ambiguity and ambiguity). However, it also tries to answer the following questions. Is morality an expression of personal emotions? Do morals require social inventions? Is morality a sacred command? Can people comply with moral requirements? How can one protect them?