What elements are at genuine risk of running out and what are the implications of them running out?

Most of my clients are animal producers and grain producers are second. They still have a large farm in terms of arable land. Nevertheless, many people still limit soil sample analysis to a minimum, ie every five years. Over the years, we found that when the soil analysis was updated, the soil phosphate content decreased. Frankly, we will fall to the sacred nonsense of "authentic phosphorus" from the level of "astronomers". In most cases, I will see a fertilizer recommendation from various places.

Why are they still buying phosphorus? There is a deep-rooted idea. "We are in a cold weather, if the weather in spring is a bit cold, even if the soil is rich, the plants do not have phosphorus". To be honest, even a super wealthy field happened early in spring, and in rainy and cold months, corn without phosphorus looks better than other maize. You may see it being a little red or purple. However, when we measured production at the end of the season, there was not any difference many times. In addition, in most cases, corn is "worse" than usual because soil is compressed, organic matter is less, air is not present in the springless harsh phosphate-free areas, plants develop good root system It makes it difficult. They often solve the problem by placing fertilizer on the seed, rather than attempting to resort to calm weather and try to study how to improve soil health and reduce compression. As I said, however, at that time, most of the time until the end of the summer, at harvest, we see no difference in production.

They got various information from sales representatives and research. Security at extra fee is very attractive. It seems a bit dazzling, it seems that fertilizer may not be sufficiently expensive, but some people may question themselves seriously. In particular, especially when the majority of income comes from horses, poultry and other things.

But did you think about this? We say that our "adventure" is "fragile", but that is a pointless phrase. We can only take a risk of exhaustion. But we never lose ourselves. If we are rejected, we may suffer a bit, but this does not consume our future happiness, meaning, purpose and realization. We usually do not do anything to "risk it". It's just a way to honor a brave little capitalist. We will never lose. Because of uncertainty, there is no 'risk'. Certainly, people may not like you. You must not greet you, you notice, want, want longing. so? Again, everyone wants only a small capitalist of the soul. You are neither a printer nor a car, do you? So, if there is only one person in the world that truly loves you, what is the difference?

I am really scared that time runs out. As we are really out of time, I will not say that as an irrational fear. I agree that it does not bring too much thought, as we can not do so many things to get more time. But what we can do is to add more content in our time. You can not get more time, but you can trick your brain to change the perception of time This is basically the same thing. I have been feeling this feeling for a long time, but I am still young, so I can not express it with words. A few years ago, I found a specific excerpt from Magic Mountain of Thomas Mann. It seamlessly and accurately describes my idea, and I am sure that countless others have the same insight when reading.