What do you think about Monarchy? Isn't it better than a Republic?

Both are good and some are bad. In some cases, the monarchy is more free than the republic, and vice versa is also true.

Thus, in terms of living standards and real freedom, regardless of whether the state is a republic or a monarchy, it all depends on politics.

But the Republic is excellent in terms of symbolism and the value I represent. Nobility and social class should not be inherited. In the Republic, rich may have political power. But he can not guarantee his son has the same power. But for the monarchy, please follow the dynasty route. One father told his son that he would become king one day. Not because he is a great man with a good personality but because he is a symbol of the country and hedonists who make him uselessly declining do not respect him

For the British Commonwealth countries like Australia and Canada, they should get their heads of state by electing local rulers or electing the president. How about Queen II of Queen Elizabeth? If she is not used to her land, language, culture, tradition, how does she represent Canada?

If there must be a monarchy, try to do so on the basis of equality and minimalism. It must be a constitutional monarchy, all major political decisions are discussed and decided by elected officials, and at the end they are officially signed. The royal family should receive a decent wage, but should not receive luxury. They should not intervene in a unique palace, but often interact with their compatriots.

The monarchy is more democratic than the Republic. Canada is a constitutional monarchy and today it is the most democratic government. Indeed, most democracies in the world are constitutional monarchies, and most non-democratic countries in the world are republics. Of course there are exceptions. Countries such as France and the United States are democratic republics, but so far most republics are undemocratic. The remaining power of the Queen makes the monarchy more democratic. For example, the Queen has the right to dismiss the Prime Minister who is doing illegal activity or has tampered with Canadian democratic institutions. After the dismissal, the Queen can do a quick election to promote democracy.

Especially after the First World War or the Second World War, many countries abolished the monarchy in the 20th century and became a republic. The defense of republicanism is called republicanism, and the protection of monarchy is called monarchy. In modern times, monarchy is more common in smaller countries than big powers. The monarchy is tied to the genetic control of politics and social culture, where the monarchy was under lifelihood control (some monarchs do not retain the status of tenure, historically it is also contemporary Even the status of power when a child or family member died grew up in the royal family, the royal family and the court.

Europeans tend to interpret the term republic as a country without a monarch. Therefore, Britain, Canada, Australia, Spain, Kuwait, and many other monarchical countries are not themselves republics, but are called monarchies. Today, most monarchic countries are constitutional monarchies that demand political power to the people and their representatives. Therefore, they are both monarchic and democratic. The problem is that the government "created by indirect election people" is clear that he is not a republic, it is a constitutional monarchy is included