The goal of animal rights activists is to give basic rights to animals to release them from all "exploitation conditions" as they say. That's why at least some of this movement is called "Animal Liberation Movement".
Misunderstanding that animal rights activists are hoping to give non-human animals the same rights as human beings is widespread. I do not want you to vote for a cat, or I do not have the right to own a weapon by a dog. The problem is not whether animals should have the same rights as humans, but whether they have the right to use them for animals and use them for our purposes. The rights of animals are different from the welfare of animals. In general, the term "animal rights" means that humans do not have the right to use animals for their own purposes. "Animal welfare" means human beings have the right to use animals as long as humanitarian treatment is carried out. Regarding the location of animal rights in factory management, there is no right to slaughter animals as food regardless of how animals are treated while alive and the animal welfare department eliminates some cruel practices I hope that.
Animal rights movement is a relatively new ideology that encompasses the philosophy that animals have rights and these rights are equivalent to human rights. Animal rights activists reject animals for any purpose, regardless of whether the animals are treated humanely. Animal rights activists do not believe that any kind of animals should be used for research, sports events, entertainment facilities, or as food. Animal rights activists do not believe that animals should be used as working animals and believe that breeding and exhibiting animals in zoos and protective parks is a form of exploitation. Animal rights activists actively seek legal measures to advance the agenda, and in some cases, such actions have not only dramatically influenced the livestock industry, but also to the happiness of animals It had a serious effect. It may be an unintended result, but it is irrelevant.