What Counts as Knowledge

I have insisted that theology was promoted to academia over and over again. The problem of humanismism for the moment is "What is regarded as knowledge?" The above argument is based on the belief that theology is not a field of knowledge. Religious studies are often left out in the area of ​​faith. This epistemology arises from the belief that there is no scientific basis for religious studies; it is based on ancient scriptures and old-fashioned texts.

When deciding what is knowledge (a person to choose from culture), Pring is well aware that negotiations are not appropriate - decisions must be made "reasonably". At least feminists believe that "rationality" is a particularly effective means by which strong power can be incorporated into something that can not legitimately express their own interests. Using the whole power. Beyond university (see Ramazanoglu, 1992)

Knowledge and reasoning requirements have been proved acceptable for interpretation of relativity theory. Cognitive relativity is a cognitive norm that determines what is regarded as knowledge or whether beliefs are reasonable, rational, etc., changes due to the conceptual or cultural framework of the region, and they pursue or pretend I think that it lacks universality to do. Three important assumptions of cognitive relativity are: As Paul Boghossian pointed out in the development of a sharp criticism of relativism, cognitive relativity said, "There are many fundamental differences." There is compatibility, but "the same effective way" to understand the world, science is one of them (Boghossian 2006a: 2). The important argument of the relativists is that we can sympathically believe that our recognition system is superior to all recognition systems or better than the equivalent justification of different recognition systems.

It is a correct consideration to contribute to this belief. Cognitive relativism, also called cognitive relativism, is the most difficult to learn and is simply understood as relativism about knowledge derived from the Greek "knowledge". The idea of ​​cognitive relativism is very structurally similar to that of moral relativists. Thus, cognitive relativists argue that all knowledge claims are only true (or incorrect) to a particular standard and that the standard itself can not be true. Therefore, cognitive relativists believe that our morality is better than other tribes, and that our science is only a regional knowledge system. Cognitive relativists are usually cultural relativists; therefore, they believe that each belief system reflects a particular person's lifestyle and culture, no one says better than anyone else It is not possible.