What behavior outrages you?

Two things are hypocrisy and bullying. I do not mind those moralists as long as they are consistent and admit defeat when it hits. Jesus did not tell us not to judge, but we should be fully aware that we are judged according to the same standards. It is a pity that many people tried to destroy Bill Clinton and they themselves took a worse action.

"Abuse of power" is similar to hypocritical matter whether it is material, political or legitimate. I do not know if they are the heads of the two of the same monster. You can not attack and defeat the bully properly - it is a fair battle, the most common number of hypocrites seems to be a bully. There are no differences such as Newt Gingrich, Henry Hyde, Bob Livingston, Dennis Hast ... only the group of "Scott Faks" who needs their kicks.

(The same applies to Democrats living in luxury homes that can pay poor wages and pay eac rubber chicken more than $ 1,000 before offering a $ 20 campaign dinner to homeless families. )

Another problem with anger is that it may hurt ability to solve problems. There are places of anger and fear. As we saw in Uber, there are destructive and passive attacks in places where there is fear. The problem still exists. It is not spoken or productively resolved. The human brain prefers problems / solutions in black and white thinking. When conflicting values ​​are intertwined in reality - in this case "women become technically better" and "the technical industry is not always fair for women" - it creates huge logic. Crack, we can not solve our thoughts. This leads to anxiety and leads to anger

This has an impact. In September, Yale University psychologist Mr. J. Crockett published a paper on "Natural human behavior". And argue that as moral violence changes as it is pushed through the social network. Mr. Crocker states as follows. "Digital media can promote the expression of moral resentment by triggering, reducing personal costs and raising personal interest." Gender to reduce the social benefits of anger, and even possibly increase new social costs by increasing polarization. "