What arguments can be made for the point of view that the government should not protect workers from unfair jobs?

The main way to make this assertion is to say that it is extremely difficult for the government to judge what constitutes an unfair act. This is beyond the ability of the government to judge

Protecting workers from dangerous labor is one thing for the government. We judge jobs that are not secure more objectively. Looking at injuries and deaths at work, it can be said that work is not safe. It is also clear that workers should not be put in a dangerous situation in the workplace.

By contrast, things are much more difficult with fairness issues. There is no objective way to judge whether it is unfair to pay $ 8.00 per hour since working at a fast food restaurant in New York for 2 to 3 years.

Because of these problems it is useless for the government to protect workers from unfair labor. With regard to wages and promotion opportunities, it is impossible to judge which work is unfair. So (we can say) the government should not make these decisions

This is an important point. Everyone who wants to protect Atlus employee's work says that despite these problems, workers should buy games so that they can continue their work. They are not responsible for the company, but they hurt the workers by buying a broken system that destroys human life and labor. People who support workers while not encouraging enterprises to take ethical labor practices while encouraging purchasing are more likely to be liars pretending to emphasize the ability to acquire the media they want to consume than the consuming media is. Possible

Because of these problems it is useless for the government to protect workers from unfair labor. With regard to wages and promotion opportunities, it is impossible to judge which work is unfair. So (we can say) the government should not make these decisions

What kind of discussion can be made about the idea that the government should not protect workers from unjust labor?

Protecting workers from dangerous labor is one thing for the government. We judge jobs that are not secure more objectively. Looking at injuries and deaths at work, it can be said that work is not safe. It is also clear that workers should not be exposed to dangerous situations during work. Because of these problems it is useless for the government to protect workers from unfair labor. With regard to wages and promotion opportunities, it is impossible to judge which work is unfair. So (we can say) the government should not make these decisions

What kind of discussion can be made about the idea that the government should not protect workers from unjust labor?

Of course, external compensation is still important for workers. Salary is an important consideration for most workers to accept work and unreasonable compensation can be a powerful incentive. However, after people find jobs and unfair problems are resolved external rewards are less important because the daily motivation is driven by internal compensation. To determine these essential rewards, we first analyze the nature of today's work. Essentially, most workers today need to manage their own, in order to take advantage of their wisdom and experience, to guide work activities to achieve important organizational goals. This is a way to add value to innovation, problem solving, and improvisation so that today's employees can meet customer needs.