What are the pros and cons of the women's suffrage movement in the United States?

As the former educator stated, the most obvious "pro" is the "first wave" of the sprinter movement, considered the "first wave" of the American feminist movement, expanded the scope of the election , Bring the country closer to actuality. Democratic movement principle

In the background of their era, feminists are a very radical group. They are not opposed to speaking or making extreme things (such as hunger strikes) to make publicity their cause. By comparing Caesar with Wilson in Germany, these feminists gathered attention from the media and solved the irony of the United States fighting for democracy in Europe, not in the United States. By the way, Wilson was a very traditional Virginian who initially did not support women's suffrage, but after personal meeting with the feminist he became more receptive.

One possible "fraud" of sports is that it is not more comprehensive in race or class lines. Like radicals like feminists, they reflect their time in many ways. From the beginning of the movement in the middle of the 19th century to the adoption of the 19 th revision in 1920, the most visible members of the women's suicide movement were middle-class white women. Sojourner Truth is the only black woman who will participate in the 1848 Seneca Falls conference and the aim is to show that black women are often excluded from women's understanding.

At that time, Lucy Stone filled with optimism made a speech emphasizing the advantage of giving white women the right to vote, arguing that it is more advantageous for the country. Henry Blackwell, a member of the American Women Suffrage Association organized by her husband Julia Ward Howe, wrote an open letter entitled "What can be done in the South" to the southern legislature. White women are participating in voting rights, whites' political superiority remains safe

Of course, the main members of women's suffrage movement are women's voting rights. This is the right they should have had long ago. It is certainly a profession to bring more justice to the American system.

It is difficult to identify faults that give women the right to vote. The best argument you can make is to insist on the shortcomings of the suicide movement itself (not the result of that movement). Participation in female protest actions (such as a comparison of President Wilson and Caesar) is outdated and you can argue that they make the United States a more polite society.

However, this is a very difficult argument to understand. The U. S. campaign did not do anything truly radical and violent by British feminists. Therefore, the discussion to support this movement is more reliable than any discussion against it.

Anti-abuse is a political campaign consisting of men and women, starting from the second half of the nineteenth century and aiming to stop women's suffrage in Australia, Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Anti-women's concept is mainly conservative campaign aimed at opposing the idea of ​​maintaining the current state of women and giving women equal voting rights. It is closely related to "domestic feminism" and I believe that women have the right to freely at home freely. In the United States, these activists are often called "remonstrants" or "anti".

Men participate in the campaign in the United States, but most opposition campaign groups are led and supported by women. These groups publicly state that they want to leave politics to men, but in more cases women show political institutions through opposition elections. In the struggle for adopting the 19 th revision, women are playing an increasingly leading role in campaign opposition campaigns. Helen Kendrick Johnson's Woman and Republic (1897) is a praised anti-selection document explaining the reasons for opposing women's voting rights. Molly Elliot Seawell's The Ladies 'Cartet (1911), Ida Tarbell's The Business of a Woman (1912), Grace Duffield' s Goodwin 's anti - election: Ten Reasons (1915), Annie Riley Hale' s The Eden Sphinx (1915) Another book in 1916) This was also widely accepted by the media and was used as "a consistent reason against women's elections".