What are the pros and cons of humans switching from hunting-gathering to agriculture?

I am convinced that there are many reasons at both ends, but I do not know because I am reading this girl.

Specialization (and Social Structure): You can get more food now, so you can have less time to get food. People do not have to worry about survival, they are one of the main requirements of food and can realize innovation and productivity improvement.

Villages (and property): Hunter collectors must often relocate as local food resources are exhausted. This means that you carry everything you have and you have to leave space for jewelery. In agriculture, you now settle down (the building becomes more attractive and invests time) and you have to build (and work) on your arable land.

Wealth: Now that we produce a lot of food, you now have a form of money. You can trade with the rest of the food and service, because agriculture has greater food supply, you can realize the concept of mobile money

Conflict: Since all the land can be cultivated and not desirable, people are starting to compete for "good" lands

Malnutrition (and sickness): We now depend on several crop options. For hunter collectors, you accept more diverse meals, but it requires vitamins. However, in agriculture, despite the large supply of food, you are more susceptible to disease and malnutrition.

Environment damage: Many such problems may occur due to domestication. We use excessive cultivation to destroy the land and leave a little nutrient in the earth. This puts undue pressure on the local ecosystem.

This is an interesting question, but the only reason we have advanced so far is that we are now looking at agriculture for all these millenniums.

More than 12,000 years ago, humans shifted from hunting and assembly to organizational agriculture. Africans have been actively participating in the famous agricultural revolution that spans several kingdoms for centuries. Since then, we are suffering from productivity and innovation, we can not achieve food security and have some of the highest malnutrition rates worldwide. The reasons are different, we can argue, but the results can not be disputed. From the 18th century to the 19th century, humans developed steam engines, founded textile industry, invented machine tools and factories, and established telecommunications, transportation and power infrastructure. As we know today, the industrial revolution is often said to be the most important event in human history since animal autonomy. Africa is the source of important raw materials and labor to promote this revolution, but the benefits of this revolution surpass most of the African economy again.

About 15000 years ago, human beings gradually began hiring agriculture. Initially, humans raised some animals to supplement hunting and gatherings and liked the garden, but after all, all societies except one in the world were diverted to agriculture and pastoralism only after all did. Compared with hunting and gathering, agriculture can support more people per acre, but it involves a price. As long as our team is small, we have a psychological mechanism to effectively deal with community members. If you live with the same 150 people everyday, you will know them very well. However, if your number is tens of thousands or tens of thousands, most of the people you interact with each day are strangers. Therefore, due to the surplus of food produced by agriculture, the life of the first city appeared.

Once humans began to form permanent settlements, abandoning the hunting and gathering process, agriculture was born. Agriculture has brought a new approach to nutrition and viability to crumbling species. This new organization killed the hunter-gatherer as a dominant human being and changed it to the present state. Some people tend not to agree with this statement, but agriculture is an important and important step in human survival. Agriculture is not an option as agriculture is an important adaptation measure for population growth in the eastern world. As hunter collectors compete successfully with other species, their population density will inevitably increase. Land management can only support one person per 10 square miles, demand is rising. Due to agricultural adaptation, the population density has increased 100 times.

Comparison of essay.com/Essay of Agriculture and Hunter Gatherer Community, and Jared Diamonds' Famous Agricultural Paper Refutation

Comparison of agricultural papers and Hunter Gatherer society, and refutation against Jared Diamonds' famous agricultural paper