What are the differences between the Articles of Confederation, the Virginia Plan, the New Jersey Plan, the Hamilton Plan, and the U.S. Constitution?

According to federal terms from 1777 to 1789, the government is basically a parliament of one parliament (one parliament), each state consists of a few representatives, each state has one vote . Members of the Congress will chair the agency annually, but there are no independent administrative agencies or justice agencies. Most importantly, Congress lacks taxation rights. Under this system, the state has the highest power, which turned out to be a problem after the revolution.

Virginia state delegation proposed by the Virginia delegation at the Constitutional Constitution Conference that the powerful executive of the bicameral system which the proportion of the state is proportional to its scale is to put the highest authority of the Diet in Parliament . And justice. This is often referred to as a "great country" program, as a representative program will benefit more populated states. Accordingly, William Patterson's New Jersey plan differs from the Virginia state program in many ways, but most importantly, it requires a single parliament, just like the article there are votes in each state .

Hamilton's plan calls for complete exclusion of the state and its integration into a unified country. Congress becomes a bicameral system, both the House of Councilors and the executive department serve life. It is very similar to the UK government model and has not been seriously considered.

The Constitution is a product of many compromises, but for the purpose of this problem, it should be noted that it includes elements of New Jersey and the Virginia program. Since the provincial Roger Sherman proposes this, the process of this event is often called Connecticut infringement. It contains three familiar government departments, but in particular it has a bicameral parliament. In the House of Representatives and the House of Representatives, representation rights are determined by the population of the country. In the Senate, each state permits two senators

After the Virginia plan started, New Jersey representative William Patterson called for a break to review the plan. According to federal terminology, each state has equivalent representation in Congress - one vote per state. Paterson's New Jersey plan is ultimately an objection to the Virginia plan. According to the New Jersey Plan, each House of Council votes Congress is inherited from federal terms. This position reflects the belief that the state is an independent organization that can voluntarily enter and leave the United States.

One criticism of Virginia's program is that it requires a new government as well as federal provisions. New Jersey is going to fix several ways of thinking of federal government terms. The New Jersey plan has 11 resolutions, some of which are as follows. According to the New Jersey plan, the composition of the government is divided into three departments: legislation, administration, and justice. Legislative authority (Congress) will come from all states, and each province has one vote regardless of population, which is one room system (one parliament). The Virginia plan calls for a bicameral system (two meetings). Congress is authorized to establish an executive committee for a term of four years. There are multiple people in the management department, most of them can be deleted. The judiciary has no authority over the state and is appointed by the executive branch for lifelong service.

Both New Jersey and Virginia state programs provide solutions to US problems under federal conditions, but there are significant differences between the two programs. The main differences in the "Philadelphia Convention" debate are related to the discussion on "delegation of empowerment of the new administration, subsequent branches, establishment of checks and balances and representative principles, and specificity of diversified implementation". After a few hours of delegation dispatch, it seems unlikely that a small country that does not want proportional representation can accept plans, and if there is one executive, they are afraid of oppressive leaders. Representatives of the Constitutional Council challenged the two proposals. After three days of deliberation, the New Jersey plan was dismissed due to the broad demand for effective central government. Both programs have advantages, but they do not address the concerns of all participants.