What are the differences between Palestinian-Israel and Kurdish-Turkey situations?

If you study the terror of the world, you will find that it is often associated with national, nationalistic and separatist struggle. For example, in France, since 1976, the Corsica has striven for independence of Corsica (a part of France since 1768). The Basque people are seeking independence in northern Spain and the Basque Country in the south of France. In the Brittany region in the northwest corner of France, a few Brittany are seeking more autonomy (since 1966). Kashmir was one of the 569 independent principals of British colonies in India and was divided into India and Pakistan because of rulers of Hinduism in 1947, but the majority of the population was Muslims. Since then, the armed struggle has liberated some of the rule of India. Organizations related to these groups are fighting intensely with the government

The Kurdish people's struggle has more similarities with the national struggle of Europe and India than Palestinians, but shares a similar history of commitment violations of Western allies with Palestine.

More than 20 million Kurds in northeast Syria's Iraq, north-western Iran and southeastern Turkey. Like many other races under the control of the Ottoman Empire, these Kurds enjoyed autonomy until the end of the 19th century. After the First World War, Western allies promised to make Kurds an independent country, but the Kurds were finally assigned to Turkey, Iraq and Syria. Like the Corsican, the Basque, the Brittany People's Republic and the Kashmiris, the Kurds are governed by the governments of these countries.

Regarding the issue of imperial construction and colonialism, after the First World War, the UK and its allies chose to impose Europe on Arab Palestinians by pursuing Zionist leaders and terrorism strategies . Jewish settlers - a colonial genocide regime that made them unpopular in their hometown - they insisted on their land for Jews all over the world and called them GM "Arabs" Call, the existence of denying them as a state. [Reading terrorism: How the Israeli country will win]

Turkey: Maintaining a good relationship with Israel for a long time, Turkey has become increasingly parental Palestine in recent years. That Islamic Prime Minister Recep Tape Prime Minister Erdogan has established a position as a supporter of Palestinian causes of ideology, domestic and geopolitical reasons. The conflict between Israel and Turkey over the Israeli attack on Turkish aid mission to Gaza has cut off diplomatic relations between the two countries for many years. They were renormalized in 2016, but they are still fragile. Saudi Arabia: The kingdom has donated hundreds of millions of dollars to the Palestinian Authority and is the driving force for the peace plan of the Arab League, which replaces traditional Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. Saudi Arabia is not yet aware of Israel, but mutual hostility towards Iran bilateral relations brought unprecedented labor relations between Saudi Arabia and the Israeli government.

Israel - The characteristic of Palestinian relations is the imbalance of power between the parties. Israel has governed this area militarily and economically. Both Israelis and Palestinians have similar historical stories including injustice and evacuation, but their deep religious, political and cultural differences add another difficulty to this relationship. In order to understand the feasibility of future policy choices, it is necessary to understand the power of these psychological aspects in shaping the current decisions. Chapter 11 examined some of these problems.

At the geopolitical level, the differences between basins are mainly due to the different reactions between Israel and Turkey in upstream coastal countries. Israel has made more adjustments than Turkey. Part of the reason is that Israel can alleviate vulnerability through adaptive technology, which can help to deal with more serious water shortages in neighboring countries. This technology includes recovery of wastewater, desalination of seawater, and movement of water in the basin. The amount of additional water released from Turkey after the drought is limited and Syria could not significantly increase the amount of water downstream of Iraq. After the civil war broke out in Syria, the relationship between the Asad government and Turkey worsened and the conflict environment in the Euphrates river basin worsened.