Western Media Bias: Conflicts in the Western World

In our evolving world, we are aware of the types of materials currently being reported by the media and how they have been distributed recently. Although there should be little political bias of media and government distribution, the view of the Arab world, especially the West of the Arab Spring, varies greatly depending on the relationship with the state. For example, Dabashi shows that President Obama often compares Israeli children with their children, but he has never met with Palestinian children about the conflict between Israel and Palestine There is nothing.

The Western media refers to the news media in the western world. The roots of the western media can be traced back to the late fifteenth century when the printing press began operating in Western Europe as a whole. The emergence of media in the 17th century must be closely related to the spread of printing presses. In the 16th century, the advantages of Latin literary use, the impact of economic change, the "discovery" of trade and tourism, the movement to the "new" world, science and art, and rapid communication by printing decreased . Lead to increasing content of Western European language media

Ideological and political conflict between the West and the Arab and Muslim world is one of the most important phenomena in the modern era, and this struggle is arbitration, reproduction and dissemination by media. The US and Western media have dominated the world media environment so far, but the emergence of new Arab media and the new Arab public domain has paved the way for fruitful dialogue and better mutual understanding. But Western media break the Arab and Muslim stereotypes, incorporate the voice of more Arabs and Muslims into their programming and production agencies, and are more true than ideological positions and prejudice We must provide dialogue and discussion. Likewise, the emerging Arab public sphere should be open to Western voice and dialogue, as well as diverse views in this region. Media can promote information-based dialogue and discussion and increase polarization.

A series of books explores the dominant framework of the world's media, how discourse and distribution will help bias the West world and the Arab and Muslim world. The story is two-sided: how the Western media produced a dominant negative stereotype devilizing Islamic fundamentalism, and how Arab media promoted the negative image of the West. It's more complicated. Lawrence Pintak's reflection in "The Eye of the Blood" (2006) provides a very useful overview of prejudice against Americans, Muslims and Arabs each other. Pintak suggests that this distorted picture is based on fundamentally different religion and world view. Each camp site forms a mutual observation with a dichotomy called "others" (15f; 77ff). Faster