The original article by Scott Jaschik "The heart and heart in plagiarism" was published in the online news section of the website "Inside Higher Ed". This site may be accessed by the general public, but it is mainly used by highly educated university professors. Therefore, the intended audience for this article is a university-level teacher. Jaschik explained the plagiarism from the viewpoint of students and teachers so he asked the teacher to understand the opinions of the students who might be interested in the teacher.
Plagiarism in plagiarism education in education seems to be done under completely different practical rules. In the political or business world, you can generate emotional reactions such as plagiarism (Bowman, 2004) and "winning heart and spirit with plagiarism" (Jaschik, 2008). In education, plagiarism is considered "contrary to our common intellectual values, and it has a serious impact on those who committed such acts" (Isserman, 2003).
When it plagiarizes, college writing educators are pessimistic about the success of eliminating this problem. It is difficult for them to find ways to promote academic integrity to prevent university students from committing such academic fraud. In addition, most of them will only use punitive law enforcement agencies, or simply punitive plagiarism students. Scott Jaschik, editor of Inside Higher Ed, solved this problem with "hearts of plagiarism and warts of war". - ... Although rarely goes over a few pages, these poems often contain letters and themes from other sources, usually Greek mythology. Some of these poems are not truly dramatic monologues. They are not titles, they are said by other people. "Mariana" is one example. These poems are dramatic and are often moved by the hero's predicament (Hadas 4-9)
As you know, Reuel to win the right war, an important lesson of the Cold War is that you can not win on the battlefield with an acceptable price, so the only option is to win the spirit and spirit and deprive the recruit is. Enemy until it eventually crashes. Do not you think this lesson is true today? Our greatest weapon in this war is the value that distinguishes us from our enemies. Considering that we have problems, do not you think that the time has come for us to deploy these weapons? Let me guarantee you that I will not use power "at first" in "diplomacy". Focusing on "soft power" by eliminating the use of force will be foolish enough to treat soft power as irrelevant - this is a concern for what we have done.